• CN 62-1175/P
  • ISSN 1006-7639
  • 双月刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊

干旱气象, 2026, 44(1): 115-125 DOI: 10.11755/j.issn.1006-7639-2026-01-0115

论文

京津冀地区一次极端暖区暴雨成因分析

董琪如,1,2, 王莹3, 李英华,1, 杨旭4, 梁康壮1

1.天津市海洋气象重点实验室,天津市气象科学研究所,天津 300074

2.中国气象局水文气象重点开放实验室,北京 100081

3.天津市气象台,天津 300074

4.天津市环境气象中心,天津 300074

Causes analysis of an extreme warm-sector rainstorm in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region

DONG Qiru,1,2, WANG Ying3, LI Yinghua,1, YANG Xu4, LIANG Kangzhuang1

1. Tianjin Key Laboratory for Oceanic Meteorology,Tianjin Institute of Meteorological Science,Tianjin 300074,China

2. China Meteorological Administration Hydro-Meteorology Key Laboratory,Beijing 100081,China

3. Tianjin Meteorological Observatory,Tianjin 300074,China

4. Tianjin Environmental Meteorological Center,Tianjin 300074,China

通讯作者: 李英华(1981—),女,高级工程师,主要从事数值模拟研究。E-mail:liyinghua05@163.com

责任编辑: 王涓力;校对:黄小燕

收稿日期: 2025-04-27   修回日期: 2025-05-28  

基金资助: 灾害天气科学与技术全国重点实验室开放课题(2025KFA19)
天津市科技重大专项(25ZXSFSN00060)
中国气象局水文气象重点开放实验室开放研究课题(23SWQXM004)
海河流域气象科技创新项目(HHXM-TD202504)
天津市海洋气象重点实验室开放基金项目(2023TKLOM02)
湖南省气象局创新发展专项(CXFZ2025-MSXM68)

Received: 2025-04-27   Revised: 2025-05-28  

作者简介 About authors

董琪如(1992—),女,高级工程师,主要从事资料同化技术及灾害性天气分析研究。E-mail: dongqiru77@163.com

摘要

随着华北暖区暴雨事件增多,研究暖区暴雨过程中尺度对流系统发生及演变机制对提升暖区暴雨预报能力具有重要意义。基于高分辨率(3 km)WRF(Weather Research & Forecasting Model)中尺度模式,结合欧洲中期天气预报中心第五代全球气候再分析数据集(ERA5)0.25°×0.25°再分析资料,利用常规、雷达观测数据快速更新同化,对京津冀地区一次极端暖区暴雨过程的环流背景、热动力结构、水汽输送特征进行数值模拟研究。结果表明:(1)经快速更新同化观测资料的高分辨率WRF模式能较好地模拟此次暖区暴雨过程,对中小尺度系统回波及传播机制有很好体现,验证了模式对暖区暴雨关键过程的表征能力;(2)此次过程动力特征表现为“3支急流”协同作用:950 hPa超低空急流、850 hPa低空急流配合200 hPa高空急流右侧出口区的强辐散,形成垂直抽吸结构。低层阶段性演变特征(超低空急流的建立-低空急流强度脉动-低空急流的增强与维持)是强降水过程发生并维持的关键因素。(3)在低空急流强度脉动及辐合造成的上升运动增强下,暖湿气流不断被抬升,促进水汽凝结并产生降水。同时中层弱干空气向下侵入高暖湿区,触发不稳定能量释放对此次过程也有加强作用。(4)低层高湿环境为暴雨提供了充沛水汽条件,随着低空东南急流的增强,促使来自渤海湾的水汽不断汇入京津冀地区。强水汽聚集再配合强有力的动力条件,是局地短时强降水发生的主要原因。

关键词: 暖区暴雨; 低空急流; 高空急流; 数值模拟

Abstract

With the increasing frequency of warm-sector heavy rain events in North China, it is of great significance to study the occurrence and evolution mechanism of mesoscale convective systems during warm-sector heavy rain processes to improve the forecasting ability of warm-sector heavy rain. This research conducts a numerical simulation on the circulation background, thermodynamic structure, and moisture transportation characteristic of an extreme warm-sector rainstorm event in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region using the high-resolution (3 km) WRF (Weather Research & Forecasting Model) mesoscale model, combined with the 0.25°×0.25° reanalysis data from the fifth generation global climate reanalysis dataset (ERA5) of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, along with conventional and radar observation data for rapid assimilation updates. The results demonstrate that: (1) The high-resolution WRF model, which has been rapidly updated with assimilated observational data, can effectively simulate this warm-sector rainstorm process, accurately representing the radar echo characteristics and propagation mechanisms of meso-small scale systems, verifying the model’s capability to characterize key processes of warm-sector rainstorms. (2) The dynamic characteristics of this process are characterized by synergy of “three jet streams”: the 950 hPa ultra-low-level jet, the 850 hPa low-level jet, coupled with the strong divergence in the exit region on the right side of the 200 hPa upper-level jet, forming a vertical suction structure. The phased evolution characteristics of the low level (the establishment of the ultra-low-level jet, the fluctuation of the low-level jet intensity, the enhancement and maintenance of the low-level jet) are the key factors for the occurrence and maintenance of the heavy precipitation process. (3) Enhanced upward motion induced by low-level jet intensity fluctuation and convergence continuously lifts warm-moist airflow, promoting water vapor condensation and precipitation. Meanwhile, downward intrusion of mid-level weak dry air into high warm-moisture areas triggers the release of unstable energy, further intensifying the process. (4) The low-level high-humidity environment provides abundant water vapor conditions for the heavy rain. With the strengthening of the low-level southeast jet stream, water vapor from the Bohai Bay continuously flow into the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. The strong accumulation of water vapor, combined with powerful dynamic conditions, is the main cause of local short-term heavy precipitation.

Keywords: warm-sector rainstorm; low-level jet; upper-level jet; numerical simulation

PDF (36550KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

本文引用格式

董琪如, 王莹, 李英华, 杨旭, 梁康壮. 京津冀地区一次极端暖区暴雨成因分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2026, 44(1): 115-125 DOI:10.11755/j.issn.1006-7639-2026-01-0115

DONG Qiru, WANG Ying, LI Yinghua, YANG Xu, LIANG Kangzhuang. Causes analysis of an extreme warm-sector rainstorm in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Arid Meteorology, 2026, 44(1): 115-125 DOI:10.11755/j.issn.1006-7639-2026-01-0115

0 引言

暖区暴雨的概念最早由黄士松(1986)提出,指发生在地面冷空气或锋面(包括冷锋和静止锋等)大约200 km以外的暴雨。后期被广义地定义为不受冷空气影响的暴雨(高守亭等,2018)。此类暴雨具有突发性强、短时雨强大、局地性显著等特点,常引发内涝、滑坡、洪涝等灾害,严重影响人民生命财产安全(何立富等,2016;沈晓玲等,2024;Zhou and Li,2024)。

暖区暴雨在不同地区体现不尽相同,研究其降水特征、触发机制及演变机理对区域防灾减灾至关重要。以华南沿海为例,该地暖区暴雨与孟加拉湾对流活动、冷池效应、中尺度对流涡旋及地形强迫密切相关(Wang et al.,2014;李向红等,2015;Wu and Luo,2016;Luo et al.,2017;Du et al.,2020;Zhang et al.,2022)。华北作为中纬度区域,该地区暖区暴雨受多系统相互作用影响,物理机制较为复杂。如2012年7月21日北京暖区暴雨事件,暴雨发生在“东高西低”的环流形势下,低涡(西南涡和西北涡)、切变线和低空急流为此次过程的主要影响系统,而中尺度对流系统的频繁发生发展、稳定少动则是此次暖区暴雨形成的重要原因(谌芸等,2012;俞小鼎,2012;孙建华等,2013;Zhong et al.,2015;段伯隆等,2017)。近年来华北盛夏暖区降水事件频发,研究表明该区域暴雨多由局地触发及组织化发展的中小尺度系统造成,且与低空急流存在密切相关(徐珺等,2014;谌芸等,2018;孙密娜等,2018;张芹等,2018;张芹等,2019;雷蕾等,2020)。已有统计结果显示,64%的暖区暴雨事件存在低空急流,尤其伴随着超低空急流(Du and Chen,2018;Zhang and Meng,2018;Zeng et al.,2019)。在基于多源观测资料分析的基础上,相关研究利用数值模拟再现暖区暴雨过程,探究中小尺度系统对暖区暴雨的影响,以更好理解暖区暴雨中尺度对流系统的触发、维持和演变机制,为华北地区暖区暴雨的预报提供理论支撑(周玉淑等,2014;Mao et al.,2018;Sun et al.,2019;祁璇等,2021)。

2020年8月12日京津冀地区发生的极端暖区暴雨事件,特征尤为突出,其短时雨强突破历史极值,多地自动站日降雨量刷新其建站以来8月中旬历史极值(杨晓亮等,2021)。该过程受多尺度系统相互作用影响,形成机制复杂,段宇辉等(2025)基于区域自动站加密资料、再分析资料、卫星及雷达等多源资料,对此次暖区暴雨的降水特征、环流背景、中尺度系统特征及其成因进行了初步分析。但由于垂直资料只有来自邯郸站风廓线雷达0~4 km风场数据,在高低空动力条件配置、低空急流传播及超低空急流演变特征等方面分析还不足,其中尺度系统动力、热力三维结构特征及其演变机制仍未完全明晰。

本文基于高分辨率(3 km)快速更新同化预报模式,对2020年8月12日发生在京津冀地区的极端暖区暴雨过程开展精细化数值模拟,利用模拟的三维高时空分辨率数据,研究此次暴雨动力、热力垂直结构特征和水汽条件,并重点关注低空急流、超低空急流及高低空动力条件的协同作用机制,系统分析此次华北地区极端暖区暴雨成因,为比较不同地区暖区暴雨事件演变机制的异同提供更多理论参考依据。

1 资料与方法

1.1 数据资料

所用资料包括分辨率为0.25°×0.25°欧洲中期天气预报中心(European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts)的ERA5再分析资料,气象大数据云平台“天擎”提供的站点实况降水及快速更新同化预报模式的高分辨率模拟输出资料,时间分辨率均为1 h,使用资料时段为2020年8月11日18:00—12日15:00(世界时,下同)。

模式系统所用资料包括:分辨率为0.5°×0.5°的全球数值预报系统(Global Forecast System,GFS)资料,时间分辨率为6 h,时段为2020年8月11日18:00—12日00:00;地面气象站、机场地面报、船舶、飞机报、探空站、多普勒雷达等同化资料,时间分辨率为1 h,时段为2020年8月11日18:00—12日09:00。

1.2 试验设计

快速更新同化预报系统主模式为WRF(Weather Research & Forecasting Model)V4.2,同化系统采用WRF-3DVar(Three Dimensional Variational Assimilation),提供每3 h更新的24 h预报。初始场和边界条件采用GFS资料,设置两层嵌套区域,水平分辨率为9、3 km,格点数为649×500、550×424,垂直层数50层,模式层顶为50 hPa。模拟试验采用的参数化方案见表1,其中d02区域(图1)不使用积云参数化方案。模式系统于2020年8月11日18:00冷启积分至12日00:00,随后每3 h热启一次并逐1 h输出模拟结果。为匹配此次暖区暴雨过程降水集中时段,基于8月12日09:00热启的高分辨率模拟结果(3 km)开展分析。

表1   模式主要参数化方案

Tab.1  Main parameterization schemes of the model

物理方案选项设置
微物理方案新Tompson
近地面方案MM5相似理论
陆面方案Noah
行星边界层方案ACM2 PBL
积云参数化方案Kain-Fritsch(d02区无)
长波辐射方案RRTM
短波辐射方案Dudhia

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


图1

图1   快速更新同化系统预报内层3 km区域

(阴影为地形高度,单位:m)

Fig.1   The 3 km inner forecast area of rapid update assimilation system

(The shaded for terrain height,Unit: m)


2 结果分析

2.1 降水实况及天气形势

2.1.1 降水实况

2020年8月12—13日,京津冀地区出现暖区暴雨(杨晓亮等,2021;段宇辉等,2025),部分地区达大暴雨。其中,强降雨主要集中在12日09:00—15:00,多站次出现短时强降水,河北文安站降雨强度最大达102.2 mm·h-1。从24 h降水空间分布(图2)可见,强降雨带整体呈西南—东北走向,河北中部、北京多地站点达大暴雨量级。此次暖区暴雨具有范围较广、对流性强等特点。

图2

图2   2020年8月12日00:00—13日00:00 24 h累计降水量(R)(单位:mm)空间分布

Fig.2   The 24 h accumulative precipitation (R) from 00:00 August 12 to 00:00 August 13,2020 (Unit: mm)


2.1.2 环流特征

图3(a)可见,8月12日06:00,500 hPa低涡中心气压为560 dagpm,位置大致在蒙古地区,京津冀地区在冷涡东南侧,处于槽前暖湿气流中;200 hPa高空急流强度最大(55 m·s-1以上)位于内蒙古地区,河北西部急流强度在30 m·s-1以上,北京南部有较强辐散。12日15:00[图3(b)],低涡向东移动,最低气压为556 dagpm,200 hPa高空急流东移,北京、河北北部地区急流强度分别增至30、35 m·s-1以上。高层环境条件显示京津冀地区均处于200 hPa高空急流出口分流辐散区,辐散特征明显。

图3

图3   2020年8月12日06:00(a、c)和15:00(b、d)500 hPa位势高度(实线,单位:dagpm)、风场(箭矢,单位:m·s-1)和200 hPa高空急流(阴影,单位:m·s-1)(a、b),以及850 hPa位势高度(等值线,单位:dagpm)、风场(箭矢,单位:m·s-1)和低空急流(阴影,单位:m·s-1)(c、d)

Fig.3   The 500 hPa geopotential height (contour lines,Unit: dagpm),wind field (arrow vectors,Unit: m·s-1) and 200 hPa high-level jet (the shaded,Unit: m·s-1)(a,b),and 850 hPa geopotential height (contour lines,Unit: dagpm),wind field (arrow vectors,Unit: m·s-1),and low-level jet ( the shaded,Unit: m·s-1)(c,d) at 06:00 (a,c) and 15:00 (b,d) August 12,2020


12日06:00[图3(c)],850 hPa蒙古地区也存在低涡中心,气压为132 dagpm。京津地区上方为东南偏南气流,在河北南部的低空急流区左侧,有偏南气流与东南气流辐合;至12日15:00[图3(d)],蒙古地区低涡向东移动,与500 hPa低涡位置较一致。北京东部、天津北部及与河北交界地区为低空急流区,最大风速超16 m·s-1,在此区域存在明显的气流辐合,形成暖式切变线。

总体来看,京津冀地区高空辐散、低空辐合的环流形势,为此次暖区暴雨提供了有利的动力条件。其中8月12日09:00—15:00是京津冀地区暖区暴雨集中时段。

2.2 数值模拟结果验证

从12日10:00 站点降水实况[图4(a)]和模拟的1 h降水量[图4(b)]对比可看出,模拟的降水覆盖范围较实况偏大,雨带略微偏南,在天津地区有虚假降雨带,但短时强降水中心与实况较为一致,均位于39°N附近,模式对暴雨落区、降雨量级的模拟较好。为进一步验证模拟结果的可靠性,选取12日09:00—15:00的实况[图4(c)]与模拟[图4(d)]的6 h累计降水量再次进行对比,发现模拟的雨带与实况基本一致,均呈西南—东北走向。虽然模拟的降水区域范围偏大,位于北京的强降水中心降水位置偏东南,但雨量模拟与实况接近。

图4

图4   2020年8月12日10:00(1 h)(a、b)和09:00—15:00(6 h)(c、d)实况(a、c)与模拟(b、d)累计降水量(单位:mm)分布

AB线段为雨带走向6 h累计降水量大值中心区)

Fig.4   Distribution of observed (a,c) and simulated (b,d) accumulated precipitation at 10:00 (1 hour)(a,b) and from 09:00 to 15:00 (6 hours)(c,d) August 12,2020 (Unit: mm)

(The AB line denotes the core region of the 6-hour accumulated precipitation maximum along the orientation of the rainfall belt)


整体而言,暖区暴雨的雨带走向、强度和位置等的模拟结果与实况偏差较小,在可接受的误差范围内。因此,可利用模式输出的高分辨率数值模拟结果,对此次暖区暴雨过程中尺度系统、热动力结构、水汽输送特征进行分析。

2.3 中尺度系统维持及演变

暖区暴雨过程中尺度系统发生、发展机制复杂,是造成此类暴雨预报难度较大的主要原因之一。利用模拟的高分辨率资料对该次暴雨过程的中尺度系统演变、热动力结构及其水汽输送特征开展分析。

2.3.1 最大反射率

图5为快速更新同化模式模拟的8月12日10:00—15:00的最大反射率。可以看出中尺度对流系统(图内黑框)由南向北逐渐移动,45 dBz以上回波范围开始扩大。10:00,回波表现为南北向的积状云强回波结构;12:00—14:00,河北南部有对流单体不断涌现,并向东北方向移动,形成明显的“列车效应”,与实况较为一致(杨晓亮等,2021);14:00,回波移动至北京与天津北部,反射率因子大值区(55 dBz以上)位于北京与天津交界处,此后逐渐向东北方向移动至天津北部;15:00,中尺度对流系统移动至天津北部,模拟位置相较实况偏东,故模拟的降水大值区也较实况偏东。

图5

图5   2020年8月12日10:00—15:00不同预报时次模拟的最大雷达反射率(单位:dBz)

(黑色方框为影响此次暴雨的中尺度对流系统)

Fig.5   Simulated maximum radar reflectivity (Unit: dBz) at different forecasting time from 10:00 to 15:00 on August 12,2020

(The black box represents the mesoscale convective system that influenced the rainstorm)


此次暴雨过程的降水回波与2012年7月21日北京暖区大暴雨回波相似,均有明显的“列车效应”传播特征(孙继松等,2012)。

2.3.2 动力过程

低空急流等中尺度系统与华北暖区暴雨密切相关(谌芸等,2019)。图6为模拟的8月12日11:00、13:00、15:00 850 hPa风场及散度分布。11:00,天津上空为东南风暖湿气流,受低涡影响,有偏南风和偏东南风的风向辐合,辐合位置大概在北京以南(图中黑框),随着低涡系统逐渐向东北方向移动,辐合位置也向东北方向推进(12:00图略);13:00,辐合位置从京津冀中部向东北方向推进,东南风急流增强发展,最大在39°N附近有强辐合区(图中黑框),表现为偏南风风速的辐合。15:00,低涡移动至北京西南部,天津上空为偏南气流,风速为16~26 m·s-1,该时刻有4处强辐合区,与模拟的最大反射率回波较对应(图5)。其中,图中Ⅰ区是局地的西南风和南风辐合;Ⅱ区辐合既存在西南风和南风的辐合,同时也存在风速辐合;Ⅲ区则是偏南风和东南风的局地强辐合,风速均为18~22 m·s-1;Ⅳ区是风速的骤减造成该处的强辐合。

图6

图6   2020年8月12日11:00(a)、13:00(b)、15:00(c)模拟的850 hPa风场(风矢,单位:m·s-1)及散度(填色,单位:10-4s-1

(黑色方框为强辐合区,椭圆为风场辐合处)

Fig.6   The simulated 850 hPa wind field (wind vectors,Unit: m·s-1) and divergence (the color shaded,Unit: 10-4 s-1) at 11:00 (a),13:00 (b),15:00 (c) on August 12,2020

(The black box indicates the area of strong convergence,and the ellipses represent the convergence point of the wind field)


通过高分辨率低层风场模拟能看出,受低涡移动及东南气流增大影响,850 hPa局地辐合增强,低层上升运动加强,促使中尺度对流单体不断发生、发展(图5),导致降水增强并逐渐向东北方向移动。

图7为2020年8月12日10:00—15:00的风场沿雨带走向6 h累计降水量大值中心区[图4(d)AB线段]的垂直剖面。10:00,117.19°E以西低层风速为4~10 m·s-1,存在范围较广的弱上升运动,而以东950 hPa存在偏东风急流,并随高度逐渐转为东南风;11:00,950 hPa偏东风急流向西延伸至116.48°E左右,115.41°E—116.30°E整层有弱上升运动,其中115.77°E处800 hPa左右有来自偏南风和偏东风的辐合,故在其附近垂直速度升至1 m·s-1,700 hPa垂直速度达 2 m·s-1以上;图7显示10:00—12:00低层116.48°E附近东风逐渐增强。12:00,116.30°E附近950~600 hPa中低层风速均大于12 m·s-1,特别在750 hPa风速达16 m·s-1以上,说明暴雨期间存在低空急流和超低空急流的一个跃增现象(图略),同时低层上升运动增强,850 hPa垂直速度在1 m·s-1以上且范围增加;13:00,低层偏南风与偏东风的辐合区大致在116.48°E处,750 hPa左右转为偏南风与东南风的强辐合,风速在16 m·s-1以上,在116.48°E以东低层东南风风速较12:00明显增大,850 hPa风速达22 m·s-1,低层有垂直上升运动,上升速度大值区主要位于中层600 hPa附近,最大至4 m·s-1以上;14:00,低层风场辐合位置移动至116.65°E,该处以西低层900 hPa偏南风速低空急流增大,750 hPa上升速度增至1 m·s-1以上;至15:00,东南低空急流最大在117.19°E 、850 hPa附近,为22~24 m·s-1,偏南风与东南风的强辐合使得空气抬升,850、700 hPa垂直速度分别在1、2 m·s-1以上。13:00—15:00,950 hPa超低空急流范围向下延伸至地面,同时低层大气存在明显的低空急流脉动特征,有急流强度的突增和突减,对应对流单体的列车效应传播机制(图5),且在116.83°E附近有长时间低空急流维持及加强,从16 m·s-1增加至24 m·s-1,与后期天津西北部回波最大反射率因子大值区(图5)较为对应。

图7

图7   2020年8月12日10:00—15:00模拟的沿图4(d)中AB线段风矢量(风矢,单位:m·s-1)、垂直速度(填色,单位:m·s-1)和风速(等值线,单位:m·s-1)的垂直剖面

(a)10:00,(b)11:00,(c)12:00,(d)13:00,(e)14:00,(f)15:00

(红色方框为低层东风逐渐增强区,紫色方框为低空急流强度脉动区)

Fig.7   The simulated vertical cross sections of wind vectors (wind vectors,Unit: m·s-1),vertical velocity (the color shaded,Unit: m·s-1) and wind velocity (isolines,Unit: m·s-1) along the AB line of the Fig.4(d) from 10:00 to 15:00 on August 12,2020

(a)10:00,(b)11:00,(c)12:00,(d)13:00,(e)14:00,(f)15:00

(The red box indicates the area where the low-level easterly wind is gradually strengthening,and the purple box indicates the intensity pulsation zone of the low-level jet)


整体来看,该时段高空200 hPa均有急流,整层也存在上升运动,不同时次最大垂直速度位置不一。10:00后950 hPa超低空急流范围逐渐扩大;受低涡移动和低层偏南风风速增加的影响(图6),风场辐合位置也逐渐向东移动,上升运动大值区也逐渐向东移动,在12:00低层上升运动显著增强。13:00后,低空东南急流从950 hPa延伸至750 hPa左右,且风速、范围均随时间增大,使更多水汽输送至京津冀中部;同时,低层暖式切变线进一步北抬,低层存在明显的风速脉动特征。动力结构特征显示,低空急流的建立、低层长时间维持的风场辐合再结合低空急流风速加强、超低空急流的出现,为暴雨的产生提供了有力的动力条件。同时,低空急流强度的脉动促使对流单体的产生并产生短时强降水,而低空急流的维持也有利于京津冀中部地区持续性降水。对流单体新生位置(图5)与低空急流风速脉动造成的瞬时辐合中心具有良好的时空一致性,表明低空急流脉动是驱动“列车效应”的关键动力因子。

2.3.3 热力结构

热力稳定性通常采用假相当位温(θse)随层结变化特征进行表征。图8为2020年8月12日不同时次θse及散度沿雨带走向6 h累计降水量大值中心区[图4(d)AB线段]的垂直剖面。可以看出,整层θse均在340 K以上,而地面及500 hPa对流层中下层空气更为暖湿,θse大致在356 K以上,表明此次过程是由暖空气强迫造成的暴雨事件。

图8

图8   2020年8月12日模拟的11:00(a)、13:00(b)、15:00(c)沿图4(d)中AB线段的假相当位温(等值线,单位:K)和散度(填色,单位:10-4s-1)的垂直剖面

Fig.8   The simulated vertical cross sections of potential pseudo-equivalent temperature (isolines,Unit: K) and divergence (the color shaded,Unit: 10-4s-1) along the AB line of the Fig.4(d) at 11:00 (a),13:00 (b),15:00 (c) on August 12,2020


11:00,115.41°E—116.12°E低层散度为负值区,115.77°E以东从地面至700 hPa为风场辐合区,500 hPa对流层为辐散区,二者形成强烈的抽吸效应,上升运动增强,对应图7中700 hPa上升速度为2 m·s-1以上,这种高低层散度场的垂直配置促使暖湿空气剧烈抬升至400 hPa左右,大量水汽发生凝结产生强降水;13:00,低层辐合位置东移至116.48°E,700 hPa的θse增至356 K左右,地面θse为352 K,其上方500 hPa仍存在风场辐散,θse为356 K;15:00,低层风场辐合区移动至117.00°E附近,θse增到356 K左右,空气更为暖湿,且950~700 hPa存在强辐合,将θse为356 K的暖湿空气最高抬升至200 hPa,500~200 hPa伴有强辐散,该时刻高层辐散、低层辐合特征最强。

从热力结构分析可看出,暖湿气流逐渐增强,暴雨过程主要发生在辐合前方暖区,低层与高层θse相差仅2 K左右。此次过程热力不稳定作用较小,动力抬升机制的影响更为突出。随着低空急流的增强和超低空急流的建立,低层辐合增强,再配合高层的强辐散,使得上升运动加强,强上升运动持续驱使地面暖湿空气抬升,促使水汽发生凝结释放潜热,造成暴雨。同时,来自600 hPa高空槽前的弱干空气随时间向下侵入高湿区,会触发不稳定能量释放(Menard and Fritsch,1989;黄美金等,2022),对此次暖区暴雨也有重要的加强作用。

2.3.4 水汽输送特征

暴雨的产生离不开水汽的输送供应。8月12日12:00,京津冀地区925、850、700 hPa最大比湿分别达24、18、10 g·kg-1,相对湿度在80%以上,低层环境处于高湿状态(图略)。图9为950 hPa低层水汽辐合、风场及比湿随时间的演变。可以看出,11:00河北南部比湿大约为26 g·kg-1,天津中部为22 g·kg-1,有强水汽通量辐合从渤海湾输送至天津中部;受低涡东侧的东南风急流影响,在河北南部局部地区有强水汽辐合。13:00,天津南部、北京以南比湿均为26 g·kg-1,位于渤海湾的偏东风、东南风急流增大,风速最大为22 m·s-1,强水汽辐合带延伸至北京南部,水汽通量散度最大超-0.7×10-6 g·cm-2·hPa-1·s-1,受地形影响,北京沿山一带有局地的强水汽辐合,但风速偏小(2~4 m·s-1);位于39.2°N、116.5°E处的水汽强辐合区域(图中黑框),与850 hPa散度负值区较为对应,此处模拟的降水量级与实况也较为相似。15:00,26 g·kg-1高比湿区向北推进至北京中部,渤海湾水汽也输送至北京北部,北京大部分地区位于强水汽辐合带,但850 hPa北京南部风速整体偏弱(2 m·s-1左右),模拟的风速辐合主要在北京与天津交界处,故模拟的降水大值区偏东[图4(d)]。

图9

图9   2020年8月12日11:00(a)、13:00(b)、15:00(c)模拟的950 hPa水汽通量散度(填色,单位:10-6 g·cm-2·hPa-1·s-1)、风场(风矢,单位:m·s-1)、比湿(绿色等值线,单位:g·kg-1)、地形(线段填充区域,单位:m)

(黑框为水汽强辐合区)

Fig.9   The simulated water vapour fux divergence (the color shaded,Unit: 10-6 g·cm-2·hPa-1·s-1),wind field (wind vectors,Unit: m·s-1),specific humidity (green isolines,Unit: g·kg-1) and terrain height (the area filled with line segments,Unit: m) at 950 hPa at 11:00 (a),13:00 (b),15:00 (c) on August 12,2020

(The black box denotes the region of intense water vapor convergence)


分析此次过程的水汽条件及输送特征,京津冀地区均处于高湿环境,局地存在强水汽的聚集,配合局地风场辐合,是促进中尺度系统强降水的主要原因。同时也能看到,虽然北京沿山地区存在强水汽聚集,但风速偏小,低层辐合弱,缺少较强的动力抬升作用,这是此次模拟的北京地区降水偏弱的原因。

综上,950 hPa超低空急流,将渤海湾水汽不断输送至暴雨区,形成较强的水汽通量辐合,为暖区暴雨提供了充足的水汽条件;850 hPa西南急流与东南急流交汇形成的气旋式切变,激发出较强的上升运动,促使低层上升气流建立并触发对流不稳定能量释放;200 hPa高空急流增强引起低层扰动加强,使低空急流在高空急流出口区右侧强烈发展,对低空急流的维持和增强具有重要作用。在这种高低空急流协同作用下形成动力耦合效应,引发持续的强上升运动,为此次暖区暴雨提供了有力的动力条件。

3 结论

本研究基于快速更新同化模式对2020年8月12日京津冀发生的一次极端暖区暴雨开展高分辨率数值模拟,并结合ERA5再分析资料,对此过程的环流背景、动热力结构、高低空环境条件配置及其水汽输送等特征进行分析,得到以下主要结论。

(1)此次暴雨影响系统主要是高空蒙古低涡,配合低层低涡、高低空急流的耦合作用造成。200 hPa急流出口分流、500 hPa对流层辐散,再配合850 hPa辐合,整层抽吸作用有利于暖区暴雨发展。

(2)经快速更新同化的数值模式对此次暖区暴雨的中尺度系统有较好的捕捉能力,强降水中心虽有一定偏移,但整体效果较好。动力机制表现为高空、低空、超低空3支急流的协同作用:京津冀地区200 hPa高空持续存在强西风急流,950 hPa超低空急流的建立增强了暖湿输送,850 hPa低空急流强度脉动促使对流单体形成“列车效应”,随后低空急流的增强与维持,使上升运动持续加强。

(3)此次降水过程整层空气较为暖湿,热力不稳定作用小。受辐合东侧低空急流增强和超低空急流建立的影响,配合高层的强辐散,使得上升运动加强,强上升运动不断使地面暖湿空气向上抬升,发生凝结进而造成暴雨。且中层600 hPa弱干空气下倾,触发不稳定能量释放,对此次过程也有加强作用。

(4)受东南急流增大影响,来自环渤海的强水汽输送带将水汽不断汇入京津冀地区,为此次暖区暴雨提供了有利的水汽条件,水汽聚集区配合低层辐合,是造成局地强降水的原因之一。

本研究主要聚焦于华北暖区暴雨中尺度对流系统发展过程的热动力三维结构特征演变及水汽条件分析,尚未探讨中尺度对流系统的触发机制。此外,本文结论源于华北极端暖区暴雨个例的数值模拟结果,其普适性有待通过分析更多华北暖区降水事件加以验证。

参考文献

谌芸, 陈涛, 汪玲瑶, , 2019.

中国暖区暴雨的研究进展

[J]. 暴雨灾害, 38(5): 483-493.

[本文引用: 1]

谌芸, 吕伟绮, 于超, , 2018.

北方一次暖区大暴雨降水预报失败案例剖析

[J]. 气象, 44(1): 15-25.

[本文引用: 1]

谌芸, 孙军, 徐珺, , 2012.

北京721特大暴雨极端性分析及思考(一)观测分析及思考

[J]. 气象, 38(10):1 255-1 266.

[本文引用: 1]

段伯隆, 张文龙, 刘海文, , 2017.

北京“7·21”特大暴雨过程暖区降水和锋面降水的时空分布特征

[J]. 暴雨灾害, 36(2): 108-117.

[本文引用: 1]

段宇辉, 孙云, 刘昊野, , 2025.

一次华北暖区暴雨的边界层环境条件分析

[J]. 暴雨灾害, 44(2): 156-166.

[本文引用: 2]

高守亭, 周玉淑, 冉令坤, 2018.

我国暴雨形成机理及预报方法研究进展

[J]. 大气科学, 42(4): 833-846.

[本文引用: 1]

何立富, 陈涛, 孔期, 2016.

华南暖区暴雨研究进展

[J]. 应用气象学报, 27(5): 559-569.

[本文引用: 1]

黄美金, 俞小鼎, 林文, , 2022.

福建沿海冷锋前暖区和季风槽大暴雨环境背景与对流系统特征

[J]. 气象, 48(5): 605-617.

[本文引用: 1]

黄士松, 1986. 华南前汛期暴雨[M]. 广州: 广东科技出版社:9-10.

[本文引用: 1]

雷蕾, 邢楠, 周璇, , 2020.

2018年北京“7·16”暖区特大暴雨特征及形成机制研究

[J]. 气象学报, 78(1): 1-17.

[本文引用: 1]

李向红, 庞传伟, 梁维亮, , 2015.

孟加拉湾旺盛对流作为广西连续暴雨的前兆信号特征分析

[J]. 气象, 41(11):1 383-1 389.

[本文引用: 1]

祁璇, 平凡, 沈新勇, 2021.

云微物理对一次吉林暖区降水过程的影响

[J]. 大气科学, 45(5): 943-964.

[本文引用: 1]

沈晓玲, 冯博, 李锋, , 2024.

一次弱天气背景下浙江局地暖区暴雨成因分析

[J]. 气象, 50(2): 170-180.

[本文引用: 1]

孙继松, 何娜, 王国荣, , 2012.

“7·21”北京大暴雨系统的结构演变特征及成因初探

[J]. 暴雨灾害, 31(3): 218-225.

[本文引用: 1]

孙建华, 赵思雄, 傅慎明, , 2013.

2012年7月21日北京特大暴雨的多尺度特征

[J]. 大气科学, 37(3): 705-718.

[本文引用: 1]

孙密娜, 王秀明, 胡玲, , 2018.

华北一次暖区暴雨雷暴触发及传播机制研究

[J]. 气象, 44(10):1 255-1 266.

[本文引用: 1]

徐珺, 杨舒楠, 孙军, , 2014.

北方一次暖区大暴雨强降水成因探讨

[J]. 气象, 40(12):1 455-1 463.

[本文引用: 1]

杨晓亮, 杨敏, 段宇辉, , 2021.

京津冀一次暖区大暴雨的成因分析

[J]. 暴雨灾害, 40(5): 455-465.

[本文引用: 3]

俞小鼎, 2012.

2012年7月21日北京特大暴雨成因分析

[J]. 气象, 38(11):1 313-1 329.

[本文引用: 1]

张芹, 苏莉莉, 张秀珍, , 2019.

山东一次暖区暴雨的环境场特征和触发机制

[J]. 干旱气象, 37(6): 933-943.

[本文引用: 1]

张芹, 王洪明, 张秀珍, , 2018.

2017年山东雨季首场暖区暴雨的特征分析

[J]. 高原气象, 37(6):1 696-1 704.

[本文引用: 1]

周玉淑, 刘璐, 朱科锋, , 2014.

北京“7·21”特大暴雨过程中尺度系统的模拟及演变特征分析

[J]. 大气科学, 38(5): 885-896.

[本文引用: 1]

DU Y, CHEN G X, HAN B, et al, 2020.

Convection initiation and growth at the coast of South China. Part II: Effects of the terrain, coastline, and cold pools

[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 148(9):3 871-3 892.

DOI      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Through conducting dynamic and thermodynamic diagnoses as well as a series of numerical sensitivity simulations, we investigated the effects of the terrain, coastline, and cold pools on convection initiation (CI) and its subsequent upscale convective growth (UCG) during a case of heavy rainfall along the coast of South China. CI occurred at the vertex of the coastal concave mountain geometry as a combined result of coastal convergence, orographic lifting, and mesoscale ascent driven by the terminus of a marine boundary layer jet (MBLJ). In numerical simulations with the coastline or terrain of South China removed, the coastal CI does not occur or becomes weaker as the MBLJ extends farther north, suggesting that the coastline and terrain play a role in CI. In addition, local small-scale terrain can modulate the detailed location and timing of CI and UCG. When the coastal concave terrain and coastline near the CI are artificially removed or filled by additional mountains, the orographic lifting and the local convergence along the coast correspondingly change, which strongly affects the CI and UCG. From a thermodynamic perspective, the coastal concave terrain plays the role of a local moisture “catcher,” which promotes low-level moistening by blocking water vapor coming from an upstream moist tongue over the ocean. Furthermore, new convection is continuously generated by the lifting of low-level moist southerlies at the leading edges of cold pools that tend to move southeastward because of the blocking coastal mountains. Sensitivity experiments suggest that the MCS becomes weaker and moves more slowly when cold pools are weakened through a reduction of rain-evaporation cooling.

DU Y, CHEN G X, 2018.

Heavy rainfall associated with double low-level jets over Southern China. Part I: Ensemble-based analysis

[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 146(11):3 827-3 844.

DOI      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Heavy rainfall occurred at both the inland frontal zone and coastal warm sector in southern China during 10–11 May 2014, which is a typical pattern in the early-summer rainy season. To clarify the key factors controlling the rainfall, we conduct an ensemble-based analysis using the operational global ensemble forecasts from ECMWF. The forecasts of frontal (warm sector) rainfall have a relatively small (large) spread and a small (large) bias of ensemble-mean amount, suggesting an obvious difference in the predictability. It is shown that double low-level jets (LLJs) in the southwesterly moist flow play a significant role in the heavy rainfall over southern China. The inland frontal rainband is closely related to the synoptic-system-related low-level jet (SLLJ) with maximum wind speed at 850–700 hPa, especially for its meridional wind component. The more intense cold front is accompanied by the stronger southwesterly SLLJ on the adjacent south side, favoring more precipitation near the front. The warm-sector heavy rainfall, a few hundred kilometers away from the front, is associated with the boundary layer jet (BLJ) at 925 hPa. The southerly BLJ occurs over the northern region of the South China Sea and reaches its maximum wind speed in the early morning. The variations of the BLJ are mainly induced by the surface low and related upper-level short-wave trough upstream. The large pressure gradient to the southeast of the surface low can accelerate the BLJ by increasing the geostrophic winds. The diurnal cycle of the low-level winds, seen in the climatology, also contributes in part to the development of the BLJ at night.

LUO Y L, ZHANG R H, WAN Q L, et al, 2017.

The southern China monsoon rainfall experiment (SCMREX)

[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 98(5): 999-1 013.

DOI      URL     [本文引用: 1]

During the presummer rainy season (April–June), southern China often experiences frequent occurrences of extreme rainfall, leading to severe flooding and inundations. To expedite the efforts in improving the quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) of the presummer rainy season rainfall, the China Meteorological Administration (CMA) initiated a nationally coordinated research project, namely, the Southern China Monsoon Rainfall Experiment (SCMREX) that was endorsed by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) as a research and development project (RDP) of the World Weather Research Programme (WWRP). The SCMREX RDP (2013–18) consists of four major components: field campaign, database management, studies on physical mechanisms of heavy rainfall events, and convection-permitting numerical experiments including impact of data assimilation, evaluation/improvement of model physics, and ensemble prediction. The pilot field campaigns were carried out from early May to mid-June of 2013–15. This paper: i) describes the scientific objectives, pilot field campaigns, and data sharing of SCMREX; ii) provides an overview of heavy rainfall events during the SCMREX-2014 intensive observing period; and iii) presents examples of preliminary research results and explains future research opportunities.

MAO J H, PING F, YIN L, et al, 2018.

A study of cloud microphysical processes associated with torrential rainfall event over Beijing

[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 123(16):8 768-8 791.

DOI      URL     [本文引用: 1]

The evolution of mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) leading to a heavy rainstorm event that occurred in Beijing on 21 July 2012 was simulated using the Weather Research and Forecasting model. Observational analyses indicated that this event can be divided into an earlier‐occurring warm‐sector precipitation (WSP) and a later‐occurring cold‐frontal precipitation (CFP). Owing to the considerable differences in their ambient weather conditions, the features and evolution of the cloud microphysics were different. Diagnoses of the mass‐ and heat‐hydrometeor budgets showed that the major differences in rainwater source were that the graupel melting (PGMLT) and the collection of snow by rain (PRACS_s2r) had similar magnitudes in the WSP, and PGMLT was larger than PRACS_s2r in the CFP, while the accretion growth of cloud droplets (PRA) was always the largest in both phases. The main cooling effect in the WSP was due to the evaporation of rainwater (PRE) and cloud water, while it was PRE and PGMLT for the CFP. The mechanisms of how microphysical processes influenced the precipitation were explored. It was found that the strong PRA in the WSP was conducive to the formation of a supercooled water level and evoked a seeding effect. However, graupel processes were crucial for the CFP. The strong sublimation processes of graupel and snow associated with the collection of droplets by graupel caused more latent heat release and drove airflow to reach a higher convection height. Moreover, the stronger PGMLT cooled the air in the MCS and reduced the effect of cloud droplet accretion growth.

MENARD R D, FRITSCH J M, 1989.

A mesoscale convective complex-generated inertially stable warm core vortex

[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 117(6):1 237-1 261.

DOI      URL     [本文引用: 1]

SUN J H, ZHANG Y C, LIU R X, et al, 2019.

A review of research on warm-sector heavy rainfall in China

[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 36: 1 299-1 307.

[本文引用: 1]

WANG H, LUO Y L, JOU B J, 2014.

Initiation, maintenance, and properties of convection in an extreme rainfall event during SCMREX: Observational analysis

[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119(23):13 206-13 232.

[本文引用: 1]

WU M W, LUO Y L, 2016.

Mesoscale observational analysis of lifting mechanism of a warm-sector convective system producing the maximal daily precipitation in China mainland during pre-summer rainy season of 2015

[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 30(5): 719-736.

DOI      URL     [本文引用: 1]

ZENG W X, CHEN G X, DU Y, et al, 2019.

Diurnal variations of low-level winds and precipitation response to large-scale circulations during a heavy rainfall event

[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 147(11):3 981-4 004.

DOI      URL     [本文引用: 1]

A succession of MCSs developed during the last week of October 2016 and produced extreme heavy rainfall in central China. The event underwent an evident shift from a mei-yu-like warm scenario to an autumn cold scenario. Diurnal cycles of rainfall and low-level winds may be modulated by the shifting of large-scale atmospheric conditions. We conducted observational analyses and numerical experiments to examine how large-scale circulations influenced rainfall systems through diurnally varying processes. The results show that, in the first half (warm) period of the event, intense rainfall mostly occurred in eastern-central China with an early morning peak. It was closely related to a nocturnal southwesterly low-level jet (NLLJ) on the flank of the western Pacific subtropical high. The NLLJ formed near midnight in southern China where ageostrophic wind rotated clockwise due to Blackadar’s inertial oscillation. The NLLJ extended downstream to central China during the predawn hours due to the horizontal advection of momentum. Both the formation and extension of the NLLJ were supported by an enhanced subtropical high that provided relatively warm conditions with surface heating for boundary layer inertial oscillation and strong background southwesterly winds for momentum transport. The NLLJ induced MCSs at its northern terminus where the low-level ascent, moisture flux convergence, and convective instability were enhanced during the predawn hours. In the second half period with an intrusion of cold air, the diurnal amplitude of low-level winds became small under relatively cold and cloudy conditions. Moderate rainfall tended to occur in western-central China with a peak after midnight, most likely due to frontogenetic processes, upslope lifting, and nighttime cloud-top cooling.

ZHANG L, MA X Y, ZHU S P, et al, 2022.

Analyses and applications of the precursor signals of a kind of warm sector heavy rainfall over the coast of Guangdong, China

[J]. Atmospheric Research, 280: 106425. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106425.

[本文引用: 1]

ZHANG M R, MENG Z Y, 2018.

Impact of synoptic-scale factors on rainfall forecast in different stages of a persistent heavy rainfall event in South China

[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 123(7):3 574-3 593.

DOI      URL     [本文引用: 1]

ZHONG L Z, MU R, ZHANG D L, et al, 2015.

An observational analysis of warm-sector rain fall characteristics associated with the 21 July 2012 Beijing extreme rainfall event

[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120(8):3 274-3 291.

DOI      URL     [本文引用: 1]

ZHOU C H, LI Y Q, 2024.

Dynamic and thermodynamic characteristics of warm-sector rainstorms caused by the southwest China vortex in Sichuan basin

[J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 155:7 095-7 108.

DOI      [本文引用: 1]

Using automatic rainfall station and ERA5 reanalysis data, the Southwest China vortex (SWCV) processes that induce warm-sector rainstorms in the Sichuan Basin were analyzed, their environmental field and dynamic thermal characteristics were researched through physical diagnosis and dynamic synthesis, and the development mechanism was discussed. The results showed that for the warm-sector rainstorms caused by the SWCV (SWCV-WR), the general circulation backgrounds can could be divided into three types: upper trough-vortex (Type I), plateau shear line (Type II), and short-wave trough (Type III) types. Regarding the aspects of the maintenance of the SWCV, duration of the warm-sector rainstorms, and maximum hourly precipitation intensity, the influence of Type I is the most evident, followed by Types II and III for SWCV-WR. The vertical structure of the SWCV is shallow and inclined to the west with height, but the positive vorticity of Types I and II can reach up to 200 hPa for SWCV-WR. The pseudo-equivalent potential temperature in the vortex area is greater than 354 K, which is accompanied by an upward-energy tongue, and shallow secondary circulation occurs on the eastern side of the SWCV, promoting vortex development. Regarding the thermodynamic characteristics of SWCV, Type I is the strongest, followed by Type III, and Type II is the weakest. The water vapor supply in different types of SWCV-WR is not only closely related to the strength of water vapor transport in the Bay of Bengal, but also to the variations in water vapor transport caused by the influence of different water vapor sources, such as the South China Sea and western Pacific Ocean, during its transportation. For SWCV-WR, the vorticity advection presents an uneven east-west positive and negative distribution. Under the dynamic forcing, the positive vorticity on the east side of SWCV of Types I and II (III) is enhanced (weakened), while that on the west side is weakened (enhanced). Different atmospheric vorticity variations have different significant effects on the three types of SWCV-WR. Under the spatial non-uniform heating, the horizontal non-uniform heating effect on the different types of SWCV-WR has regional differences, while the vertical non-uniform heating effect has the largest effect on the spatial non-uniform heating and a positive heating effect on the three types of SWCV-WR. Therefore, the spatial non-adiabatic heating effect, particularly the vertical non-uniform heating effect, is an important mechanism for the development and evolution of SWCV and SWCV-WR.

/