1988—2023年气候变化与土壤墒情关系研究的文献计量分析与可视化

doi:10.11755/j.issn.1006-7639-2024-06-0953

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

土壤墒情是重要的土壤干旱监测指标，研究其与气候变化的关系有助于揭示全球变化背景下土壤干旱的发生机制。本文基于Web of Science数据库核心数据集，对气候变化与土壤墒情关系研究主题的文献进行了分析，结果表明，1988—2023年相关文献数量呈“平稳、增长、激增”的变化趋势。其中，中国学者和科研单位发表的文献数量最多，但整体国际影响力相较美国等发达国家仍显不足。在学科分布上，研究成果主要集中于环境科学与生态学、地球科学及农林科学等领域。研究重点包括土壤-气候相互作用、土壤生态系统管理、水文气象与土壤干旱监测，以及气候数据分析与生态模型应用等方面。近年来，研究热点逐渐聚焦于前沿技术（如多源传感监测和人工智能等）在土壤干旱监测中的应用，同时，极端气候事件对不同生态系统的影响及其应对策略也成为重要研究方向。

关键词: 土壤墒情, 气候变化, 文献计量分析, 土壤干旱

Abstract:

Soil moisture is an important indicator for monitoring soil drought, and studying its relationship with climate change helps to reveal the mechanisms of soil drought under the context of global change. Based on the Web of Science Core Dataset, this study analyzes the literature on the topic of the relationship between climate change and soil moisture. The results show that the number of related publications from 1988 to 2023 follows a trend of “stability, growth, sharp increase”. Chinese scholars and research institutions contributed the most publications, but their overall international influence remains lower compared to developed countries such as the United States. In terms of subject areas, research is primarily concentrated in environmental science and ecology, earth sciences, as well as agricultural and forestry sciences. Key research focuses include soil-climate interactions, soil ecosystem management, hydrometeorology and soil drought monitoring, as well as climate data analysis and ecological modeling. In recent years, research hotspots have gradually shifted to the application of cutting-edge technologies, such as multi-source sensing and artificial intelligence, in soil drought monitoring. Furthermore, the impact of extreme climate events on various ecosystems and their corresponding response strategies have become important research directions.

Key words: soil moisture status, climate change, bibliometric analysis, soil drought

中图分类号:

P467
X825

谢子扬, 李长顺, 蔡嘉仪, 王珊珊. 1988—2023年气候变化与土壤墒情关系研究的文献计量分析与可视化[J]. 干旱气象, 2024, 42(6): 953-964.

XIE Ziyang, LI Changshun, CAI Jiayi, WANG Shanshan. Bibliometric analysis and visualization of the relationship between climate change and soil moisture from 1988 to 2023[J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2024, 42(6): 953-964.

图/表 13

参考文献 62

[1]	郭冬, 吐尔逊·哈斯木, 吴秀兰, 等, 2022. 四种气象干旱指数在新疆区域适用性研究[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 16(3): 90-101.
[2]	郎莹, 汪明, 2015. 春、夏季土壤水分对连翘光合作用的影响[J]. 生态学报, 35(9): 3 043-3 051
[3]	刘兴忠, 胡春, 何超, 等, 2024. 基于NDVI-LST模型的四川攀西地区近20 a干旱演变特征[J]. 干旱气象, 42(2): 180-186. DOI
[4]	全国气象仪器与观测方法标准化技术委员会, 2017. 土壤水分观测频域反射法:GB/T 33705—2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社.
[5]	沙莎, 王丽娟, 王小平, 等, 2024. 基于温度植被干旱指数(TVDI)的甘肃省农业干旱监测方法研究[J]. 干旱气象, 42(1): 27-38. DOI
[6]	王大龙, 舒英格, 2017. 土壤含水量测定方法研究进展[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 36(2): 61-65.
[7]	王胜, 张强, 张良, 等, 2024. 旱区陆面非降水性水分研究进展和展望[J]. 干旱气象, 42(1): 1-10. DOI
[8]	王姝, 张亮, 朱红秀, 等, 2024. 2022年7—8月干旱对川西高原植被长势的影响[J]. 高原山地气象研究, 44(1): 94-103.
[9]	武荣盛, 侯琼, 杨玉辉, 等, 2021. 多时间尺度气象干旱指数在内蒙古典型草原的适应性研究[J]. 干旱气象, 39(2): 177-184.
[10]	袁源, 李璐含, 胡伟, 等, 2023. 青藏高原土壤湿度-气候相互影响研究进展[J]. 冰川冻土, 45(2): 341-354. DOI
[11]	张学礼, 胡振琪, 初士立, 2005. 土壤含水量测定方法研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 36(1): 118-123.
[12]	张燕, 王雪姣, 张新, 等, 2024. 北疆绿洲农业区气象干旱指数的确定及干旱特征分析[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 18(4): 133-142.
[13]	赵鸿, 李凤民, 熊友才, 等, 2008. 土壤干旱对作物生长过程和产量影响的研究进展[J]. 干旱气象, 26(3): 67-71.
[14]	赵会超, 2020. 不同类型干旱的时空变化规律及其关系研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学.
[15]	周鑫原, 吕世华, 罗江鑫, 2022. CMIP6 BCC等模式对青藏高原土壤冻融模拟性能分析[J]. 高原山地气象研究, 42(2): 82-89.
[16]	ADE L J, HU L, ZI H B, et al, 2018. Effect of snowpack on the soil bacteria of alpine meadows in the Qinghai_Tibetan Plateau of China[J]. Catena, 164: 13-22.
[17]	AKINREMI O O, MCGINN S M, 1996. Usage of soil moisture models in agronomic research[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 76(3): 285-295.
[18]	AL-YAARI A, WIGNERON J P, DORIGO W, et al, 2019. Assessment and inter-comparison of recently developed/reprocessed microwave satellite soil moisture products using ISMN ground-based measurements[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 224: 289-303.
[19]	ARIA M, CUCCURULLO C, 2017. Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4): 959-975.
[20]	ATCHLEY A L, MAXWELL R M, 2011. Influences of subsurface heterogeneity and vegetation cover on soil moisture, surface temperature and evapotranspiration at hillslope scales[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 19(2): 289-305.
[21]	BABAEIAN E, SADEGHI M, JONES S B, et al, 2019. Ground, proximal, and satellite remote sensing of soil moisture[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 57(2): 530-616.
[22]	BECK H E, PAN M, MIRALLES D G, et al, 2021. Evaluation of 18 satellite- and model-based soil moisture products using in situ measurements from 826 sensors[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 25(1): 17-40.
[23]	BERG A, SHEFFIELD J, 2018. Climate change and drought: The soil moisture perspective[J]. Current Climate Change Reports, 4(2): 180-191.
[24]	BORNMANN L, MUTZ R, DANIEL H D, 2008. Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index?A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5): 830-837.
[25]	BRESHEARS D D, COBB N S, RICH P M, et al, 2005. Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(42): 15 144-15 148
[26]	CHEN H Y, ZOU J Y, CUI J, et al, 2018. Wetland drying increases the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 120: 24-27.
[27]	CORNWELL A R, DANNY HARVEY L D, 2007. Soil moisture: A residual problem underlying AGCMs[J]. Climatic Change, 84(3): 313-336.
[28]	DAI A G, 2011. Drought under global warming: A review[J]. WIREs Climate Change, 2(1): 45-65.
[29]	DAI A G, 2013. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models[J]. Nature Climate Change, 3: 52-58.
[30]	DENISSEN J M C, TEULING A J, PITMAN A J, et al, 2022. Widespread shift from ecosystem energy to water limitation with climate change[J]. Nature Climate Change, 12: 677-684.
[31]	DERMODY O, WELTZIN J F, ENGEL E C, et al, 2007. How do elevated [CO₂], warming, and reduced precipitation interact to affect soil moisture and LAI in an old field ecosystem?[J]. Plant and Soil, 301(1/2): 255-266.
[32]	DINIZ B P, GUIMARAES C M, KINOUCHI O, et al, 2005. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research valid across disciplines[J]. ArXiv e-Prints: physics/0509048. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0090-4.
[33]	DORIGO W, WAGNER W, ALBERGEL C, et al, 2017. ESA CCI Soil Moisture for improved Earth system understanding: State-of-the art and future directions[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 203: 185-215.
[34]	EGGHE L, 2006. An improvement of the h-index: The g-index[J]. ISSI Newsletter, 2(1): 8-9.
[35]	GAO L, SHAO M G, 2012. Temporal stability of soil water storage in diverse soil layers[J]. Catena, 95: 24-32.
[36]	HORTON R M, MANKIN J S, LESK C, et al, 2016. A review of recent advances in research on extreme heat events[J]. Current Climate Change Reports, 2(4): 242-259.
[37]	HUNTINGTON T G, 2006. Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: Review and synthesis[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 319(1/2/3/4): 83-95.
[38]	JUNG M, REICHSTEIN M, CIAIS P, et al, 2010. Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply[J]. Nature, 467: 951-954.
[39]	LEEPER R D, PETERSEN B, PALECKI M A, et al, 2021. Exploring the use of standardized soil moisture as a drought indicator[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 60(8): 1 021-1 033
[40]	LI X W, GAO X Z, CHANG Y T, et al, 2018. Water storage variations and their relation to climate factors over Central Asia and surrounding areas over 30 years[J]. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 18(5): 1 564-1 580
[41]	LIAN X, PIAO S L, CHEN A P, et al, 2021. Multifaceted characteristics of dryland aridity changes in a warming world[J]. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2: 232-250.
[42]	LINNENLUECKE M K, MARRONE M, SINGH A K, 2020. Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses[J]. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2): 175-194.
[43]	LIU S, SUN Y P, GAO X L, et al, 2019. Knowledge domain and emerging trends in Alzheimer’s disease: A scientometric review based on CiteSpace analysis[J]. Neural Regeneration Research, 14(9): 1 643-1 650
[44]	MISHRA A K, SINGH V P, 2010. A review of drought concepts[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 391(1/2): 202-216.
[45]	OCHSNER T E, COSH M H, CUENCA R H, et al, 2013. State of the art in large‐scale soil moisture monitoring[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 77(6): 1 888-1 919
[46]	RIGDEN A J, MUELLER N D, HOLBROOK N M, et al, 2020. Combined influence of soil moisture and atmospheric evaporative demand is important for accurately predicting US maize yields[J]. Nature Food, 1(2): 127-133. DOI PMID
[47]	ROBOCK A, VINNIKOV K Y, SRINIVASAN G, et al, 2000. The global soil moisture data bank[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 81(6): 1 281-1 299
[48]	RODRÍGUEZ-SOLER R, URIBE-TORIL J, DE PABLO VALENCIANO J, 2000. Worldwide trends in the scientific production on rural depopulation, a bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix R-tool[J]. Land Use Policy, 97: 104787. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104787.
[49]	SARKER U, OBA S, 2018. Response of nutrients, minerals, antioxidant leaf pigments, vitamins, polyphenol, flavonoid and antioxidant activity in selected vegetable amaranth under four soil water content[J]. Food Chemistry, 252: 72-83. DOI PMID
[50]	SENEVIRATNE S I, CORTI T, DAVIN E L, et al, 2010. Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 99(3/4): 125-161.
[51]	SITCH S, SMITH B, PRENTICE I C, et al, 2003. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model[J]. Global Change Biology, 9(2): 161-185.
[52]	STOCKER B D, ZSCHEISCHLER J, KEENAN T F, et al, 2019. Drought impacts on terrestrial primary production underestimated by satellite monitoring[J]. Nature Geoscience, 12: 264-270.
[53]	TRENBERTH K E, 2011. Changes in precipitation with climate change[J]. Climate Research, 47(1): 123-138.
[54]	VAN DER MOLEN M K, DOLMAN A J, CIAIS P, et al, 2011. Drought and ecosystem carbon cycling[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151(7): 765-773.
[55]	VAN ECK N J, WALTMAN L, 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping[J]. Scientometrics, 84(2): 523-538. PMID
[56]	VEREECKEN H, AMELUNG W, BAUKE S L, et al, 2022. Soil hydrology in the earth system[J]. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3: 573-587.
[57]	VICENTE-SERRANO S M, BEGUERÍA S, LÓPEZ-MORENO J I, 2010. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: The standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index[J]. Journal of Climate, 23(7): 1 696-1 718
[58]	VOGEL M M, ORTH R, CHERUY F, et al, 2017. Regional amplification of projected changes in extreme temperatures strongly controlled by soil moisture-temperature feedbacks[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(3): 1 511-1 519
[59]	WALVOORD M A, KURYLYK B L, 2016. Hydrologic impacts of thawing permafrost: A review[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 15(6): 1-20.
[60]	WANG J Z, DING J L, YU D L, et al, 2020. Machine learning-based detection of soil salinity in an arid desert region, Northwest China: A comparison between Landsat-8 OLI and Sentinel-2 MSI[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 707: 136092. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136092.
[61]	ZHAO C L, MENG X H, LI Y Q, et al, 2022. Impact of soil moisture on afternoon convection triggering over the Tibetan Plateau based on 1-D boundary layer model[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 127(2): e2021jd035591. DOI: 10.1029/2021JD035591.
[62]	ZIADAT F M, TAIMEH A Y, 2013. Effect of rainfall intensity, slope, land use and antecedent soil moisture on soil erosion in an arid environment[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 24(6): 582-590.

描述性信息	结果	描述性信息	结果
出版时间/年	1988—2023	作者数量/人	31 907
发文数年均增长率/%	22.75	所有作者出现频数/次	59 397
文献数量/篇	10 875	仅发表一篇文章的作者数/人	300
论文数量/篇	9 749	单一作者文献数/篇	324
数据论文/篇	25	平均每个作者文献数/篇	0.341
优先出版论文/篇	87	平均每篇文献合作作者数/人	5.46
会议论文/篇	129	国际合作率/%	38.15
书籍/部	3	每份文献平均被引次数/次	36.12
综述/篇	395	每篇文献年均被引次数/次	3.79
检索关键词/个	13 610	参考文献数/条	330 595
作者关键词/个	19 461	文献来源（期刊、图书等）/种	1 402

描述性信息	结果	描述性信息	结果
出版时间/年	1988—2023	作者数量/人	31 907
发文数年均增长率/%	22.75	所有作者出现频数/次	59 397
文献数量/篇	10 875	仅发表一篇文章的作者数/人	300
论文数量/篇	9 749	单一作者文献数/篇	324
数据论文/篇	25	平均每个作者文献数/篇	0.341
优先出版论文/篇	87	平均每篇文献合作作者数/人	5.46
会议论文/篇	129	国际合作率/%	38.15
书籍/部	3	每份文献平均被引次数/次	36.12
综述/篇	395	每篇文献年均被引次数/次	3.79
检索关键词/个	13 610	参考文献数/条	330 595
作者关键词/个	19 461	文献来源（期刊、图书等）/种	1 402

国家（地区）	文章数/篇	SCP	MCP	MCP比率/%	被引次数/次	篇均被引次数/次
中国	2 950	1 876	1 074	36.4	61 516	20.85
美国	2 507	1 875	632	25.2	141 598	56.48
德国	511	248	263	51.5	22 158	43.36
加拿大	445	309	136	30.6	13 201	29.67
澳大利亚	423	245	178	42.1	18 042	42.65
英国	391	197	194	49.6	22 378	57.23
印度	322	252	70	21.7	4 811	14.94
西班牙	304	177	127	41.8	17 007	55.94
法国	257	127	130	50.6	10 490	40.82
意大利	246	121	125	50.8	6 859	27.88

国家（地区）	文章数/篇	SCP	MCP	MCP比率/%	被引次数/次	篇均被引次数/次
中国	2 950	1 876	1 074	36.4	61 516	20.85
美国	2 507	1 875	632	25.2	141 598	56.48
德国	511	248	263	51.5	22 158	43.36
加拿大	445	309	136	30.6	13 201	29.67
澳大利亚	423	245	178	42.1	18 042	42.65
英国	391	197	194	49.6	22 378	57.23
印度	322	252	70	21.7	4 811	14.94
西班牙	304	177	127	41.8	17 007	55.94
法国	257	127	130	50.6	10 490	40.82
意大利	246	121	125	50.8	6 859	27.88

发文机构	来源国家	发文数/篇	被引次数/次	篇均被引次数/次
中国科学院	中国	1 579	45 341	28.72
中国科学院大学	中国	702	15 907	22.66
北京师范大学	中国	268	7 199	26.86
西北农林科技大学	中国	174	3 686	21.18
南京信息工程大学	中国	160	4 320	27.00
兰州大学	中国	157	3 475	22.13
科罗拉多州立大学	美国	155	9 934	64.09
美国地质调查局	美国	151	12 992	86.04
美国航空航天局	美国	149	14 265	95.74
加利福尼亚大学伯克利分校	美国	140	10 111	72.22