Journal of Arid Meteorology ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 491-502.DOI: 10.11755/j.issn.1006-7639(2023)-03-0491
• Technical Reports • Previous Articles Next Articles
PAN Liujie1,2(), LIANG Mian1,2, QI Chunjuan1, LI Peirong1, ZHU Qingliang1
Received:
2022-03-29
Revised:
2022-10-12
Online:
2023-06-30
Published:
2023-07-02
潘留杰1,2(), 梁绵1,2, 祁春娟1, 李培荣1, 朱庆亮1
作者简介:
潘留杰(1978—),男,陕西石泉人,正高级工程师,主要从事天气预报与研究工作。E-mail: 781483047@qq.com。
基金资助:
CLC Number:
PAN Liujie, LIANG Mian, QI Chunjuan, LI Peirong, ZHU Qingliang. Characteristics of meteorological elements and objective forecast verification at the key venues of “the 14th National Games”[J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2023, 41(3): 491-502.
潘留杰, 梁绵, 祁春娟, 李培荣, 朱庆亮. “十四运”关键场馆气象要素特征及客观预报检验[J]. 干旱气象, 2023, 41(3): 491-502.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ghqx.org.cn/EN/10.11755/j.issn.1006-7639(2023)-03-0491
资料 | 时段 | 空间分辨率 | 用途 |
---|---|---|---|
CMPAS降水网格实况 | 2008—2021年 | 0.05°×0.05° | 降水气候特征分析和预报检验实况 |
ERA5地面要素 | 1979—2020年 | 0.1°×0.1° | 气温、风速气候特征分析 |
ERA5环流场 | 2008—2020年 | 0.25°×0.25° | 环流形势分析 |
ECMWF地面要素 | 2017—2021年 | 0.125°×0.125° | ECMWF的地面要素预报性能分析 |
SCMOC地面要素 | 2017—2021年 | 0.05°×0.05° | SCMOC的地面要素预报性能分析 |
CMA-MESO地面要素 | 2017—2021年 | 0.1°×0.1° | CMA-MESO的地面要素预报性能分析 |
CLDAS 陆面网格实况 | 2017—2021年 | 0.0625°×0.0625° | 气温和风预报检验实况 |
Tab.1 The data and their detailed description
资料 | 时段 | 空间分辨率 | 用途 |
---|---|---|---|
CMPAS降水网格实况 | 2008—2021年 | 0.05°×0.05° | 降水气候特征分析和预报检验实况 |
ERA5地面要素 | 1979—2020年 | 0.1°×0.1° | 气温、风速气候特征分析 |
ERA5环流场 | 2008—2020年 | 0.25°×0.25° | 环流形势分析 |
ECMWF地面要素 | 2017—2021年 | 0.125°×0.125° | ECMWF的地面要素预报性能分析 |
SCMOC地面要素 | 2017—2021年 | 0.05°×0.05° | SCMOC的地面要素预报性能分析 |
CMA-MESO地面要素 | 2017—2021年 | 0.1°×0.1° | CMA-MESO的地面要素预报性能分析 |
CLDAS 陆面网格实况 | 2017—2021年 | 0.0625°×0.0625° | 气温和风预报检验实况 |
Fig.2 Changes of average daily precipitation (a), hourly precipitation probability (b), daily maximum precipitation (c)and hourly maximum rainfall intensity (d) at three key venues from September 15 to 27 during 2008-2020
Fig.3 The daily (a, c) and diurnal (b, d) change of temperature (a, b) and wind speed (c, d) at the three key venues from September 15 to 27 during 1979-2020 (The values of box body from top to bottom are the maximum, the upper quartile, median, the bottom quartile and the minimum in turn)
Fig.4 The rose map of wind at the three key venues from September 15 to 27 during 1979-2020 (The percentage represents frequency of wind directions, and color bars indicate average wind speed (Unit: m·s-1))(a) Yan’an, (b) Xi’an, (c) Ankang
场馆 | ECMWF | CMA-MESO | SCMOC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC/% | Bias | PC/% | Bias | PC/% | Bias | |
延安 | 75 | 1.05 | 71 | 1.05 | 85 | 0.80 |
西安 | 89 | 0.87 | 70 | 1.20 | 92 | 0.78 |
安康 | 66 | 1.20 | 68 | 1.25 | 83 | 0.93 |
Tab.2 Comparison of test indictors for different daily precipitation forecast products at the three key venues from September 15 to 27 during 2017-2020
场馆 | ECMWF | CMA-MESO | SCMOC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC/% | Bias | PC/% | Bias | PC/% | Bias | |
延安 | 75 | 1.05 | 71 | 1.05 | 85 | 0.80 |
西安 | 89 | 0.87 | 70 | 1.20 | 92 | 0.78 |
安康 | 66 | 1.20 | 68 | 1.25 | 83 | 0.93 |
Fig.5 Comprehensive test of three precipitation forecast products at different venues from September 15 to 27 during 2017-2020 (The yellow solid lines and black dashed lines indicate TS and frequency bias, respectively)(a) Yan’an, (b) Xi’an, (c) Ankang
Fig.6 The composition of 500 hPa geopotential height (black isolines, Unit: dagpm), 700 hPa wind field (blue vectors, Unit: m·s-1) and wind speed of 200 hPa jet (color filled areas, Unit: m·s-1) (a, b, c) under circulation situations with blocking pattern (a), low vortex bottom pattern (b), two-trough and one-ridge pattern (c) during the precipitation in Shaanxi from September 15 to 27 during 2008-2020, and TS (color bars) and PC (grey bars) of three objective precipitation forecast products under different circulation patterns (d) from September 15 to 27 during 2017-2020 (the area enclosed by red line for the Shaanxi Province)
Fig.7 The average error of different temperature forecast products (a, c, e) and the accuracy of error less than or equal to 2.0 ℃ (b, d, f) at the three key venues from September 15 to 27 during 2017-2020 (a, b) Yan’an, (c, d) Xi’an, (e, f) Ankang
Fig.8 The average error of different wind speed forecast products (a, c, e) and the accuracy of error less than or equal to 2.0 m·s-1 (b, d, f) at the three key venues from September 15 to 27 during 2017-2020 (a, b) Yan’an, (c, d) Xi’an, (e, f) Ankang
场馆 | ECMWF | CMA-MESO | SCMOC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC/% | Bias | PC/% | Bias | PC/% | Bias | |
延安 | 84 | 1.06 | 81 | 0.81 | 86 | 0.96 |
西安 | 86 | 1.11 | 85 | 1. 07 | 87 | 0.98 |
安康 | 76 | 1.34 | 82 | 1.20 | 80 | 0.92 |
Tab.3 Comparison of test indicators for different precipitation forecast products at three key venues during the 14th National Games
场馆 | ECMWF | CMA-MESO | SCMOC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC/% | Bias | PC/% | Bias | PC/% | Bias | |
延安 | 84 | 1.06 | 81 | 0.81 | 86 | 0.96 |
西安 | 86 | 1.11 | 85 | 1. 07 | 87 | 0.98 |
安康 | 76 | 1.34 | 82 | 1.20 | 80 | 0.92 |
Fig.9 The average error of temperature and wind speed forecast products (a, c, e) at different leading time and the accuracy with errors less than or equal to 2.0 ℃ or 2.0 m·s-1 (b, d, f) at three key venues during the 14th National Games (a, b) Yan’an, (c, d) Xi’an, (e, f) Ankang
[1] | 蔡新玲, 李瑜, 李茜, 等, 2019. 1961—2016年陕西秋淋气候变化特征及其与大气环流和海温的关系[J]. 干旱气象, 37(2):226-232. |
[2] | 陈宏, 余文韬, 徐威, 等, 2021. 天津地区冬季降水相态识别判据研究[J]. 干旱气象, 39(4):670-677. |
[3] | 邓国, 戴玲玲, 周玉淑, 等, 2022. CMA高分辨区域集合预报系统支撑北京冬奥会气象服务保障的评估分析[J]. 气象, 48(2):129-148. |
[4] | 丁德平, 王春华, 李迅, 等, 2008. 北京奥运会期间极端天气的气候统计分析[J]. 气象, 34(7):61-67. |
[5] | 方建刚, 侯建忠, 陶建玲, 等, 2008. 秦岭地区秋季降水的气候特征分析[J]. 气象科学, 28(4):415-420. |
[6] | 郭虎, 王建捷, 魏东, 等, 2008. 北京奥运期间场馆精细预报应用及分析[J]. 气象, 34(增刊1):234-240. |
[7] | 侯建忠, 鲁渊平, 王川, 等, 2005. 台风路径及频次与陕西关中秋淋天气相关分析[J]. 气象, 31(5):70-73. |
[8] | 胡艺, 符娇兰, 陶亦为, 等, 2022. 冬奥会延庆赛区气象要素分布特征分析[J]. 气象, 48(2):177-189. |
[9] |
井立红, 高婧, 赵忠, 等, 2017. 数值预报模式在新疆塔城地区降水预报中的检验[J]. 干旱气象, 35(1):134-141.
DOI |
[10] | 李德泉, 周勇, 虞海燕, 2010. 北京奥运气象服务产品制作系统设计与实现[J]. 应用气象学报, 21(3):372-378. |
[11] | 李宏宇, 马建立, 马永林, 等, 2011. 北京2008年奥运会开幕日云、降水特征及人工影响天气作业分析[J]. 气候与环境研究, 16(2):175-187. |
[12] | 李炬, 程志刚, 张京江, 等, 2020. 小海坨山冬奥赛场气象观测试验及初步结果分析[J]. 气象, 46(9):1 178-1 188. |
[13] | 李岩, 安兴琴, 左洪超, 等, 2010. 2008年北京奥运交通限制效果的模式研究[J]. 高原气象, 29(6):1 619-1 626. |
[14] | 刘俊卿, 央金卓玛, 廖晓坤, 等, 2019. 西藏高原一次冰雹天气云降水模式预报产品检验[J]. 干旱气象, 37(3):477-482. |
[15] | 刘耀龙, 张华明, 黄晓丽, 等, 2019. 山西省冰雪运动气候适宜性评价[J]. 干旱气象, 37(1):173-179. |
[16] | 潘留杰, 张宏芳, 袁媛, 等, 2015. 基于T639细网格模式的陕西省秋淋天气预报效果评估[J]. 气象与环境学报, 31(6):9-17. |
[17] | 潘旸, 谷军霞, 宇婧婧, 等, 2018. 中国区域高分辨率多源降水观测产品的融合方法试验[J]. 气象学报, 76(5):755-766. |
[18] | 王彦, 陈明轩, 王令, 2010. VDRAS产品在奥运气象服务中的应用[J]. 气象科技, 38(5):645-648. |
[19] | 薛春芳, 董文杰, 李青, 等, 2012. 近50年渭河流域秋雨的特征与成因分析[J]. 高原气象, 31(2):409-417. |
[20] | 杨璐, 王晓丽, 宋林烨, 等, 2023. 基于阵风系数模型的百米级阵风客观预报算法研究[J]. 气象学报, 81(1):94-109. |
[21] | 杨艳娟, 周慧, 2007. 奥运期间天津极端天气气候事件背景分析[J]. 气象科技, 35(6):890-893. |
[22] |
叶瑶, 李国平, 2016. 近61年夏半年西南低涡的统计特征与异常发生的流型分析[J]. 高原气象, 35(4):946-954.
DOI |
[23] |
张成军, 纪晓玲, 马金仁, 等, 2017. 多种数值预报及其释用产品在宁夏天气预报业务中的检验评估[J]. 干旱气象, 35(1):148-156.
DOI |
[24] | 张德山, 丁德平, 穆启占, 等, 2009. 北京奥运交通路段精细预报[J]. 应用气象学报, 20(3):380-384. |
[25] | CHAKRABORTY A, 2010. The skill of ECMWF medium-range forecasts during the year of tropical convection 2008[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 138(10):3 787-3 805. |
[26] | DARBY L S, WHITE A B, GOTTAS D J, et al, 2019. An evaluation of integrated water vapor, wind, and precipitation forecasts using water vapor flux observations in the western United States[J]. Weather and Forecasting, 34(6):1 867-1 888. |
[27] |
DUAN Y, GONG J, DU J, et al, 2012. An overview of the Beijing 2008 Olympics research and development project (B08RDP)[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(3):381-403.
DOI URL |
[28] |
GOLDING B W, BALLARD S P, MYLNE K, et al, 2014. Forecasting capabilities for the London 2012 Olympics[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 95(6):883-896.
DOI |
[29] |
JOE P, DOYLE C, WALLANCE A, et al, 2010. Weather services, science advance, and the Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Gamers[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91(1):31-36.
DOI URL |
[1] | CHEN Rong, WANG Jianying, YANG Wenjun, CHEN Min, WANG Qian, LI Kun. Influence factors of atmospheric boundary layer inversion in Yinchuan City and the relation with PM2.5 in winter [J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2023, 41(1): 123-131. |
[2] | QIAO Jinrong, YUAN Xinpeng, LIANG Xudong, XIE Yanxin. Application of agglomerative hierarchical clustering method in precipitation forecast assessment [J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2022, 40(4): 690-699. |
[3] | QI Yajie, CHEN Min, ZHONG Jiqin, FAN Shuiyong, LIU Ruiting, GUO Chunwei. Effect Evaluation of Short-term Forecast of Surface Meteorological Elements by Using RMAPS-ST Coupled Urban Canopy Model in North China [J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2020, 38(5): 859-868. |
[4] | TAN Changrong1, GUO Xiaoning, CHEN Qi, LI Jinhai,YOU Sangjie, MA Xuelian, MA Yuancang, QI Caihong. Study on Surface Ozone Characteristics and Its Influencing Factors in Xining [J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2019, 37(1): 31-39. |
[5] | . Variation Characteristic of Main Meteorological Elements During Summer Sand-Dust Storm Processes in East of Hexi Corridor [J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2017, 35(3): 427-. |
[6] | WANG Jianpeng, XUE Chunfang, HUANG Shaoni,WANG Dan, PAN Liujie, CHENG Lu. Sensitivity Test of Impact of Urbanization and Anthropogenic Heat on Meteorological Elements in Xi’an [J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2015, 33(3): 434-443. |
[7] | . Change Character of Weather Elements at Tazhong of Xinjiang [J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2011, 29(3): 315-321. |
[8] | LIU Shi-Xiang, DAO Jian-Gong, ZHANG Tie-Jun, CHANG Da-Cheng, FU Xiao-Gong, ZHANG Jing, SONG Xiu-Ling. Verification and Assessment of Autumn Short - term Objective Forecast of Meteorological Elements in Northwest China [J]. J4, 2010, 28(3): 346-351. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
©2018 Journal of Arid Meteorology
Tel: 0931-2402270、0931-2402775 Email:ghqx@iamcma.cn、ghs_ghqx@sina.com