J4 ›› 2006, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 57-59.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

CAWS 型自动站与人工观测风速记录的对比分析

尹宪志,1爱民2卢会云3   

  1. 1. 中国气象局兰州干旱气象研究所,甘肃省干旱气候变化与减灾重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730020;
    2. 兰州中心气象台,甘肃 兰州 730020;3. 平凉市气象局,甘肃 平凉 744000
  • 收稿日期:2005-07-07 修回日期:2005-10-17 出版日期:2006-03-30 发布日期:2006-03-30
  • 作者简介:尹宪志(1964 - ),男,甘肃徽县人,高级工程师,主要从事大气探测、应用气象研究. Email:gsqxjywcyxz@163. com.

Comparison Analysis of Wind Speed Records in Routine and CAWS Automatic Weather Station

YIN Xian - zhi1,GUO Ai - min2,LU Hui - yun3   

  1. 1. Institute of Arid Meteorology,CMA,Key Laboratory of Climatic Changing and Reducing Disaster of
    Gansu Province,Lanzhou 730020,China;2. Lanzhou Central Meteorological Observatory,Lanzhou 730020,China;
    3. Pingliang Meteorological Bureau of Gansu Porvince,Pingliang 744000,China
  • Received:2005-07-07 Revised:2005-10-17 Online:2006-03-30 Published:2006-03-30

摘要:

利用平凉气象观测站2003 年1 ~ 12 月人工站和自动站平行观测的风速、风向资料,统计比较了2003 年1 ~ 12 月人工站与自动站风速观测值和极值,结果表明:受观测仪器系统偏差和观测取值时间差异的影响,人工站比自动站的日平均风速偏小0. 4 m/ s。风向完全相符的接近40%,2 个以上方位的不相符4%。

关键词: 气象站, 自动站, 风速, 对比分析

Abstract:

Based on the wind speed and wind direction data observed in routine and automatic weather station in 2003 in Pingliang city,the statistical comparison of observed and extreme values in routine and automatic weather station from January to December in 2003 has been analyzed. The results show that in the influence of the systematic error of instruments and observational time error,the daily mean wind speed of routine station is 0. 4 m/ s less than automatic weather station,and the corresponding wind directions are nearly 40% in both routine and automatic weather stations,the ratio of disagreement over two directions is 4%..

Key words: weather station, automatic weather station, wind speed, comparison analysis

中图分类号: