三江源区植被净初级生产力时空特征及对气候变化的响应

doi:10.11755/j.issn.1006-7639(2016)-06-0958

干旱气象

三江源区植被净初级生产力时空特征及对气候变化的响应

1.兰州大学资源环境学院，甘肃兰州 730000;
2.青海省气象科学研究所，青海西宁 810001;
3.青海省海北牧业气象试验站，青海海北 810200;
4.青海省气候中心，青海西宁 810001

出版日期:2016-12-30 发布日期:2016-12-30
作者简介:周秉荣(1974- )，男，青海湟中人，硕士，高级工程师，研究方向为高寒生态学. E-mail：zbr0515@foxmail.com
基金资助:
第三次青藏高原大气科学试验“青藏高原影响及下游灾害天气的诊断与预报”（GYHY201406001）、三江源典型区高寒草甸SPAC系统水热平衡及数值模拟研究（40865006）、青海省适生牧草种植区划及栽培利用技术信息平台建设（2013-T-Y33）和青海省农牧业气候资源精细化区划及开发利用对策研究(2015-ZJ-606)共同资助

Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Vegetation Net Primary Productivity and Its Responses to Climate Change in Three-river Headwaters Region

1. College of Earth Environmental Sciences of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. Institute of Meteorological Science of Qinghai Province, Xining 810001, China;
3. Haibei Pastoral Meteorology Experimental Station of Qinghai Province, Haibei 810200, China;
4. Qinghai Climate Center, Xining 810001, China

Online:2016-12-30 Published:2016-12-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

三江源区是我国乃至亚洲重要的水源地，是高寒生态系统的脆弱区和敏感区。植被净初级生产力（Net Primary Productivity，NPP）是评价生态环境状况的重要指标。利用1961—2014年三江源区18个气象站的气象观测资料、11个监测点的草地生物量观测资料以及中国地区气候变化预估数据集的全球气候模式加权平均集合数据，通过5种估算植被NPP气候模型的对比验证，筛选出适用性好、精度高的模型构建该区植被NPP估算模型，并进行植被NPP的时空变化特征及对气候变化的响应分析。结果表明：周广胜模型对三江源区的植被NPP模拟结果有效且精度最高，故选用该模型模拟三江源区植被NPP。1961—2014年，三江源区植被NPP呈从东南向西北逐渐降低的空间分布特征，平均值为59.59 gC·m-2，其中黄河源区植被NPP的年际及空间波动高于长江源区和澜沧江源区；近54 a植被NPP整体呈显著增加趋势，但不同区域变化幅度有所差异。气温是影响三江源区植被NPP增加的主要气象因素；未来90 a三江源区植被NPP仍呈现持续增加态势。

关键词: 三江源, 植被净初级生产力, 气候变化, 预估

Abstract:

The three-river headwaters region is an important water source in China, even in the Asia, which is a vulnerable and sensitive area of high-cold ecosystem. Net primary productivity (NPP) is one of the important indicators of ecological environment evaluation. For exploring the vegetation biomass to adapt climate change in the three-river headwaters region, based on the meterological observation data at 18 weather stations during 1961-2014, biomass observation data of grassland at 11 monitoring sites during 2003-2013 and prediction data set of climate change in China during 2011-2100 from the National Climate Center, the applicable and high precision model was selected to estimate vegetation NPP in three-river headwaters region by comparing the five climate estimation models of NPP. And on this basis that the temporal and spatial variation characteristics of vegetation NPP and its response to climate change in the three-river source area from 1961 to 2014 were analyzed and predicted. The results showed that Zhou Guang-sheng’s model to estimate vegetation NPP in the three-river source region had good applicability and the highest precision, so the model was used to estimate NPP from 1961 to 2014. The spatial distribution of NPP decreased gradually from southeast to northwest in the three-river source region, the average was 59.59 gC·m-2, and the spatial and interannual fluctuations of NPP in the Yellow River source area was higher than in the Yangtze River and Lancangjiang River source areas during 1961-2014. NPP had an increasing trend in the past 54 years on the whole, but the change rates in different regions were obviously different. The temperature was an important factor to affect the increase of vegetation NPP in the three-river source region. In the future 90 years, NPP in three-river headwaters region still would continue to increase.

Key words: three-river headwaters region, net primary productivity, climate change, prediction

中图分类号:

Q14
P467

周秉荣1,2，朱生翠3，李红梅4. 三江源区植被净初级生产力时空特征及对气候变化的响应[J]. 干旱气象, DOI: 10.11755/j.issn.1006-7639(2016)-06-0958.

ZHOU Bingrong1,2, ZHU Shengcui3, LI Hongmei4. Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Vegetation Net Primary Productivity and Its Responses to Climate Change in Three-river Headwaters Region[J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, DOI: 10.11755/j.issn.1006-7639(2016)-06-0958.

[1]	吴斌, 钱业, 王瑞芳, 赵鑫, 金磊. 全球气候模式对影响西北太平洋台风强度的大尺度环境因子的模拟评估[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(3): 466-479.
[2]	刘鸣彦, 房一禾, 孙凤华, 赵春雨, 侯依玲, 崔妍, 周晓宇. 气候变化和人类活动对太子河流域径流变化的贡献[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(2): 244-251.
[3]	王兴, 张强, 王胜, 王帆. 陆面露水凝结预估模型研究进展及面临的主要科学问题与展望[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(1): 159-167.
[4]	赵琳, 王长科, 艾婉秀. 北疆地区公众对气候变化认知与适应的性别差异分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(1): 168-174.
[5]	李裕, 王小恒, 罗兴平, 康淑荷, 陈琛, 张强. 气候变化对半干旱地区作物微量元素利用率影响研究进展[J]. 干旱气象, 2020, 38(6): 895-899.
[6]	赵慧, 郭庆元, 马鹏程, 王丽娜, 刘丽伟, 刘卫平, 李常德. 陇东南地区近50 a极端低温事件演变特征及环流背景[J]. 干旱气象, 2020, 38(6): 900-908.
[7]	刘楚薇, 连鑫博, 黄建平. 我国臭氧污染时空分布及其成因研究进展[J]. 干旱气象, 2020, 38(03): 355-361.
[8]	伍清1，蒋兴文1，谢洁2，朱桦3. 基于CMIP5资料的西南地区2020—2050年气温多模式集合预估[J]. 干旱气象, 2018, 36(6): 971-.
[9]	孙银川1,2，王素艳1,2，李浩3，郑广芬1，王璠2，官景得1. 宁夏六盘山区夏季避暑旅游气候舒适度分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2018, 36(6): 1035-.
[10]	张飞民，王澄海，谢国辉，孔维政. 气候变化背景下未来全球陆地风、光资源的预估[J]. 干旱气象, 2018, 36(5): 725-732.
[11]	迪丽努尔·托列吾别克，李栋梁. 近115 a中亚干湿气候变化研究[J]. 干旱气象, 2018, 36(2): 185-195.
[12]	滕水昌，张敏，滕杰，乔琴. 1951—2016年甘肃乌鞘岭气候变化特征[J]. 干旱气象, 2018, 36(1): 75-81.
[13]	李艳丽，李永华，陈新均，杨文斌. 党河水库入库径流量的变化特征及对气候变化的响应[J]. 干旱气象, 2017, 35(6): 984-990.
[14]	杨艳娟1，曹经福1，熊明明1，赵玉娟2. 影响海河流域参考作物蒸散量的气象因子定量分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2017, 35(3): 367-.
[15]	刘璐，王景红，张维敏，李艳莉. 1971—2010年陕北红枣种植区气候变化特征及其对物候期的影响[J]. 干旱气象, 2016, 34(5): 841-846.

三江源区植被净初级生产力时空特征及对气候变化的响应

Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Vegetation Net Primary Productivity and Its Responses to Climate Change in Three-river Headwaters Region

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics