“2002.3”强沙尘暴过程的中尺度动力学诊断分析

J4 ›› 2004, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 17-21.

“2002.3”强沙尘暴过程的中尺度动力学诊断分析

王　文^1,2,隆　霄²,李耀辉¹,钱　莉³

(1.中国气象局兰州干旱气象研究所,甘肃省干旱气候变化与减灾重点实验室,甘肃兰州　730020;
2.兰州大学大气科学系,甘肃兰州　730000;3.武威市气象局,甘肃武威　733000)

收稿日期:2004-05-28 修回日期:2004-06-01 出版日期:2004-09-30 发布日期:2004-09-30
作者简介:王文(1957—),男,甘肃会宁人,博士,研究员,主要从事气候诊断和中尺度动力学方面的研究.E-mail:wangwen@lzu.edu.cn

Analysis of Mesoscale Dynamic Diagnosis of“2002.3”Sandstorm Process

WANG 　Wen^1,2, LONG 　Xiao², LI Yao-Hui¹, JIAN 　Chi³

(1.Institute of Arid Meteorology,CMA,Lanzhou　730020,China;
2.Department of Atmospheric Sciences,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou　730000,China;
3.Wuwei Meteorology Bureau,wuwei　733000,China)

Received:2004-05-28 Revised:2004-06-01 Online:2004-09-30 Published:2004-09-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

摘　要:利用较成功模拟的一次强沙尘暴过程的MM5模式输出资料进行了动力学诊断研究,计算了动量收支残差X,结果表明,3月19日高低层上,最大X矢量位于河西小槽的后部,表明动量残差主要是加速西北气流的南下。X矢量与风矢量 V的夹角在槽后<90°,这说明动量残差在槽后加速冷空气南下,非常有利于小槽的发展和东进南下。300 hPa动能转换E的带状分布非常清楚,并且E的大值中心分布在高空急流(>50 m/s)的两侧,这也表明高空急流在能量转换的过程中起到非常重要的作用。涡度、散度和位涡的分布特征与引发此次沙尘天气的河西小槽位置比较一致。轨迹分析表明,在300 hPa高空主要是低压槽起引导作用,500 hPa向东南方向移动,而在700 hPa气块在高原北侧的绕流非常明显。将沙尘浓度和气块轨迹叠加在一起时,可以确定沙尘的输送路径,所以它有一定的预报实用性。

关键词: 沙尘暴, 动力学诊断, 能量转换, 轨迹分析

Abstract:

Abstract:A model simulation of“2002.3”sandstorm by nonhydrostatic mesoscale model MM5 is analyzed in an effort to study the
mechanism of the sandstorm.The diagnosis of convective momentum transport (CMT) shows that, at every level,the maximum bud-
get residualXof the horizontal momentum is located behind the trough,whichXstrengthened the northwest cold air flow to south.
The angle between Xand Vwas smaller than 90°behind the trough,that means accelerated northwest cold air flow
to south and it is in favor of deepening the trough and moves to southeast. At the level of 300hPa, kinetic ener-
gy transferEhad clear belt distribution, and the maximum centers ofEwas mainly located on the each side of upper Jet, that
showed the upper Jet played a very important role in kinetic energy transfer. The distribution character of vorticity and divergency is
consistent with the trough that trigged the sandstorm.Model trajectories analyses indicated that there was airstream in the trough at
the upper level of 300hPa, and it flow to southeast at the level of 500hPa, there exist mountain-plain circulation to the north of the
Plateau. The sand transport routing can be determined by superimposing the sand concentration over the trajectories, theoretically,
but the forecasting of the trajectories is difficult at now.

Key words: sandstorm;dynamic diagnosis, energy transfer, trajectories analysis

中图分类号:

P458.2

王　文, 隆　霄, 李耀辉, 钱　莉. “2002.3”强沙尘暴过程的中尺度动力学诊断分析[J]. J4, 2004, 22(3): 17-21.

WANG 　Wen, LONG 　Xiao, LI Yao-Hui1, JIAN 　Chi. Analysis of Mesoscale Dynamic Diagnosis of“2002.3”Sandstorm Process[J]. J4, 2004, 22(3): 17-21.

[1]	段伯隆, 刘新伟, 郭润霞, 宋强, 狄潇泓, 段明铿. “3·15”北方强沙尘暴天气成因分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(4): 541-553.
[2]	努尔比亚·吐尼牙孜1,2,热孜瓦古·孜比布拉2,. 南疆西部冬季一次强大风的预报分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2018, 36(6): 1003-.
[3]	姜学恭，李夏子，王德军. 一次典型蒙古气旋沙尘暴的对流层顶演变及沙尘垂直输送特征[J]. 干旱气象, 2018, 36(1): 1-10.
[4]	李玲萍1，胡丽莉1，刘维成2，李岩瑛1，梁红霞1. 河西走廊东部夏季沙尘暴气象要素变化特征[J]. 干旱气象, 2017, 35(3): 427-.
[5]	杨吉萍1，胡兴才1，崔志强2. 甘肃民勤“4.24”沙尘暴过程的数值模拟分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2016, 34(4): 718-724.
[6]	郭萍萍1，杨建才2，殷雪莲1，郑学金1. 甘肃省春季一次连续浮尘天气过程分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2015, 33(2): 303-309.
[7]	王伏村，张德玉，张浩文，代德彬，刘玉洁. 一次雷暴大风引发的强沙尘暴天气的中尺度系统分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2014, 32(6): 954-961.
[8]	李光林，张铁军，任余龙，王勇. 2014年春季甘肃一次特强沙尘暴过程的中尺度模拟及触发机制分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2014, 32(6): 980-988.
[9]	冯建英，王芝兰，柳媛普，李旭. 延伸期干旱、沙尘暴过程低频方法预报系统简介[J]. 干旱气象, 2014, 32(5): 851-856.
[10]	段海霞，李耀辉. 2013 年春季沙尘天气特征及其成因[J]. 干旱气象, 2014, 32(3): 359-365.
[11]	狄潇泓，张新荣，刘新伟，沙宏娥. 甘肃省两次强沙尘暴天气对比分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2014, 32(1): 81-86.
[12]	程鹏,王宝鉴,孔祥伟,张静,伏晓红,宋秀玲. 河西走廊一次强沙尘暴天气的螺旋度诊断[J]. 干旱气象, 2013, 31(1): 144-149.
[13]	赵明瑞，杨晓玲，滕水昌. 甘肃民勤地区沙尘暴变化趋势及影响因素[J]. J4, 2012, 30(3): 421-425.
[14]	郭萍萍，殷雪莲，刘秀兰，刘德菊. 河西走廊中部一次特强沙尘暴天气特征及预报方法研究[J]. J4, 2011, 29(1): 110-115.
[15]	朱晓炜, 李栋梁, 李耀辉. 民勤地区年沙尘暴发生频次研究[J]. J4, 2010, 28(4): 401-406.