干旱气象 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 308-320.

• 技术报告 • 上一篇    

太行山及以东复杂地形下多模式降水预报日变化偏差特征研究

曲巧娜1,2,3 ,吴 炜1,2,3
  

  1. 1. 山东省气象防灾减灾重点实验室,山东 济南 250031;2. 山东省气象科学研究所,山东 济南 250031;
    3. 长岛国家气候观象台,山东 烟台 264000
  • 出版日期:2025-04-30 发布日期:2025-05-13

Diurnal variation bias characteristics of precipitation forecast about various models under complex terrain in Taihang mountain and its east area

QU Qiaona1,2,3 , WU Wei1,2,3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory for Meteorological Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Shandong, Jinan 250031, China;
     2. Shandong Institute of Meteorological Sciences ,Jinan 250031 , China; 3. Changdao National Climatic Observatory Yantai 264000,  Shandong , China ; 
  • Online:2025-04-30 Published:2025-05-13

摘要:

评估数值模式在降水日变化方面的偏差特征,有助于深入了解模式的预报能力。本文利用太行山脉、伏牛山及以东复杂地形区域的夏季降水观测资料,结合模式12~36 h预报时效的逐3 h降水量数据,计算了降水频次、降水强度及其峰值、振幅等关键参数。采用偏差分析和空间相关性分析等方法,将欧洲中期天气预报中心(European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts,ECMWF)数值预报模式、美国国家环境预报中心全球预报系统(National Centers for Environmental Prediction-Global Forecast System,NCEP-GFS)、中国气象局区域台风数值预报系统(CMA-TYM)、中国气象局上海数值预报模式系统(CMA-SH9)等业务常用模式的预报特征与实际观测结果进行对比,并对产生偏差的原因开展了初步分析。结果表明,区域模式CMA-TYM和CMA-SH9对降水的预报具有“低频次、高强度”的特征,全球模式ECMWF和NCEP-GFS则为“高频次、低强度”,且各模式预报结果与观测的空间相关性均较弱。区域模式中,CMA-TYM降水量预报偏差较小,在0附近波动,降水频次的峰值时间和日变化振幅预报效果较好;CMA-SH9对大部分时次的降水量预报正偏差最大,预报的降水强度峰值时间和日变化振幅效果最好,但预报降水频次偏大且其峰值时间基本为前半夜,而观测的华北平原、山东省中东部及黄淮平原北部的峰值时间主要出现在清晨,相差近12 h。全球模式中,NCEP-GFS的降水量预报大部分时次小于观测且夜间到清晨和下午的负偏差绝对值最大,预报的降水频次大部分时次为正偏差最大,降水强度为负偏差绝对值最大;ECMWF低估傍晚到夜间的降水量,高估清晨到中午的降水量,降水频次各时次均为正偏差,降水强度均为负偏差。综合分析有(无)降水时的气温场及风场,模式降水量迅速增大主要是CMA-SH9对晚上和ECMWF对中午预报的气温偏高配合东南暖湿气流,容易在近地层形成不稳定层结,从而触发对流天气,产生较大的降水量尤其是较大的降水频次。

关键词:

Abstract:

Evaluating the bias characteristics of numerical models in the diurnal variation of precipitation is helpful to understand the
forecasting ability of the model. The key parameters such as precipitation frequency, precipitation intensity, its peak value and amplitude are calculated by using the 3 h observation data of summer precipitation, combined with the 3 h precipitation of the 12-36 h forecast time of the model in the complex terrain of the Taihang Mountains, Funiu Mountains and the areas to their east. Using the methods of deviation analysis and spatial correlation analysis, the forecast characteristics of the ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts) numerical forecast model, NCEP-GFS (National Centers for Environmental Prediction-Global Forecast System), CMA-TYM (the China Meteorological Administration Regional Typhoon Numerical Forecast System) and CMA-SH9 (the China Meteorological Administration Shanghai Numerical Forecast Model System) are compared with the observations, and the causes of the deviations are analyzed preliminarily. The results show that the regional models CMA-TYM and CMA-SH9 have the characteristics of “low frequency and high intensity” in precipitation forecast, while the global models ECMWF and NCEP-GFS feature “high frequency and low intensity”. Moreover, the spatial correlation between each model and the observational data is weak. In the regional models, the bias of precipitation forecast about CMA-TYM is relatively small and it fluctuates near 0, and the peak time and diurnal variation amplitude of precipitation frequency are better. The CMA-SH9 has the largest positive deviation of precipitation most of the time, and the predicted peak time and diurnal variation amplitude of precipitation intensity are the best, but the frequency of precipitation is larger and its peak time is basically in the early night, while the peak time of observations in the North China Plain, central and eastern Shandong Province and northern Huanghuai Plain mainly occurs in the early morning with a difference of nearly 12 h. In the global model, the precipitation forecast of NCEP-GFS is smaller than observation in most of the time, and the absolute value of negative deviation from night to early morning and afternoon is the largest. The precipitation frequency of NCEP-GFS has the largest positive deviation most of the time, while the absolute value of the negative deviation of precipitation intensity is the largest. The ECMWF underestimates the precipitation from evening to night and overestimates the precipitation from early morning to noon, where the precipitation frequency is positive deviation, and the precipitation intensity of each time is negative deviation. According to the comprehensive analysis of the tem⁃
perature and wind field with or without precipitation, the rapid increase of precipitation in the model is mainly due to the high temperature forecasted by CMA-SH9 at night and ECMWF at noon, combined with the southeast warm and humid airflow, which is easy to form unstable stratification in the near surface layer, thus triggering convective weather and producing large precipitation, especially large precipitation frequency.

Key words: