基于SPEI的黄淮地区夏季干旱时空异常特征及成因

doi:10.11755/j.issn.1006-7639(2018)-04-0544

干旱气象

基于SPEI的黄淮地区夏季干旱时空异常特征及成因

安迪¹，李栋梁²，王自强³，武艳¹，吕翔¹，杨绚⁴

1.江苏省徐州市气象局，江苏徐州221000；2.南京信息工程大学气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心，
气象灾害教育部重点实验室，气候与环境变化国际合作联合实验室，江苏南京210044；
3.中国气象局，北京100081；4.国家气象中心，北京100081）

出版日期:2018-09-04 发布日期:2018-09-04

Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Summer Drought Anomaly and Its Causes Based on SPEI in Huang-Huai Area

AN Di¹, LI Dongliang², WANG Ziqiang³,WU Yan¹, LV Xiang¹, YANG Xuan⁴

(1. Xuzhou Meteorological Bureau of Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou 221000, Jiangsu, China;
2. College of Atmospheric Science, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology,
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters,
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210044, China;
3. China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China;
4. National Meteorological Centre of China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China)

Online:2018-09-04 Published:2018-09-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

选取黄淮流域及周边地区147个气象站1962—2015年逐月气温、降水观测资料，利用标准化降水蒸散指数（standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index，SPEI）分析了该地区近54 a夏季干旱变化及其异常成因。结果表明：黄淮地区近54 a夏季呈稳定略偏旱趋势，1990年代起该地区夏季经历了先湿后干的演变。EOF（经验正交函数）分析表明黄淮地区夏季SPEI的前3个模态为一致旱涝型、南北反位相型和东北-西南反位相型。该地区夏季偏旱年份为Ⅰ类或Ⅲ类雨型且夏季各月干旱成因有所不同，其中6月亚洲区极涡强度偏弱时，同期黄淮地区降水偏少，干旱频发；7月西太平洋副热带高压（副高）西伸脊点位置偏东（位于129°E以东），黄淮地区发生干旱的可能性较大；8月副高强度越弱，干旱风险越大。夏季青藏高原地面加热场强度偏强时，中高纬冷空气势力较弱难以影响到黄淮地区，同时，副高位置异常偏北偏西，导致该地区偏旱。

关键词: 干旱, SPEI, 黄淮地区, 青藏高原地面加热场

Abstract:

Based on the monthly temperature and precipitation observation data from 147 meteorological stations during 1962-2015 in the Huang-Huai River Basin and surrounding area. The standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) was used to analyze the summer drought change and its abnormal cause. The results show that the Huang-Huai area has maintained a stable and slightly drought trend in summer in recent 54 a. In the 1990s, the area experienced the evolution of the first wet and then dry. The first three EOF （empirical orthogonal function） modes of SPEI in summer in the Huang-Huai area showed consistent variation, the north-south anti-phase variation and northeast-southwest anti-phase variation, respectively. Discussion on the causes of drought in summer indicated that compared with flood years, it occurred either type I or type III rain in drought years. From June to August, the causes of drought in the Huang-Huai area were intra-seasonal differences. Using composite analysis method to discuss the characteristics of atmospheric circulation under the spatial distribution pattern of drought anomaly in the Huang-Huai area, when the intensity of the polar vortex in Asia was relatively weak in June, the precipitation in the Huang-Huai area was less and the drought was more frequent. The position variation of the western Pacific subtropical high (WPSH) in July had an important impact on drought and flood in the Huang-Huai area. The westward ridge point of the WPSH extended eastward, which was located east of 129°E, the possibility of drought in the Huang-Huai area was greater in July. When the intensity of WPSH was weak in August, the risk of drought in the Huang-Huai area increased. When the intensity of the surface heat field on the Tibetan Plateau was stronger in summer, cold air from the mid-latitude was weak, and it was difficult to affect the Huang-Huai area. At the same time, the position of WPSH was abnormally northward and westward, which resulted in drought in the area.

Key words: drought, SPEI, the Huang-Huai area, intensity of , surface heat field on the Tibetan Plateau

中图分类号:

P426.616

安迪，李栋梁，王自强，武艳，吕翔，杨绚. 基于SPEI的黄淮地区夏季干旱时空异常特征及成因[J]. 干旱气象, DOI: 10.11755/j.issn.1006-7639(2018)-04-0544.

AN Di, LI Dongliang, WANG Ziqiang,WU Yan, LV Xiang, YANG Xuan. Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Summer Drought Anomaly and Its Causes Based on SPEI in Huang-Huai Area[J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, DOI: 10.11755/j.issn.1006-7639(2018)-04-0544.

[1]	刘书言, 荣艳淑, 吕星月, 殷雨婷. 2012年中美两国干旱的对比分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(5): 717-726.
[2]	张继波,李楠,邱粲,薛晓萍. 水分临界期持续干旱胁迫对夏玉米光合生理与产量形成的影响[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(5): 734-741.
[3]	郁凌华,谢五三,熊世为,张鑫童,邢程,胡姗姗. 基于SPEI的安徽滁州市旱涝特征及其对小麦产量的影响[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(5): 742-749.
[4]	周惜荫, 李谢辉. 1978—2017年西南地区干湿时空变化特征[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(3): 357-365.
[5]	李万志, 张调风, 马有绚, 冯晓莉, 余迪, 陈冀青. 基于灾害风险因子的青海省干旱灾害风险区划[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(3): 480-485.
[6]	武荣盛, 侯琼, 杨玉辉, 冯旭宇, 李彬, 郑凤杰. 多时间尺度气象干旱指数在内蒙古典型草原的适应性研究[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(2): 177-184.
[7]	高睿娜, 王素艳, 高娜, 左河疆. CI和MCI干旱指数在宁夏的适应性对比[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(2): 185-192.
[8]	张超, 罗伯良. 湖南夏秋季持续性区域气象干旱的时空特征[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(2): 193-202.
[9]	王健疆, 马浩, 余丽萍, 龚理卿, 汪晨. 2019年浙江省秋旱大气环流特征分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(1): 1-7.
[10]	张翔, 韦燕芳, 李思宇, 梁达. 从干旱灾害到干旱灾害链:进展与挑战[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(06): 873-883.
[11]	彭双姿, 刘鑫淼, 陈涛, 杨敏, 许笛, 旷煜菲, 肖美英. 衡邵干旱走廊干旱监测评估方法探讨[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(06): 894-899.
[12]	李裕, 王小恒, 罗兴平, 康淑荷, 陈琛, 张强. 气候变化对半干旱地区作物微量元素利用率影响研究进展[J]. 干旱气象, 2020, 38(6): 895-899.
[13]	陈燕丽, 黄思琦, 莫建飞, 罗永明, 蒙良莉, 匡昭敏. 基于CLDAS数据的甘蔗干旱监测评估标准对比——以2011年广西干旱为例[J]. 干旱气象, 2020, 38(2): 188-194.
[14]	史尚渝, 王飞, 金凯, 丁文斌. 黄土高原地区植被指数对干旱变化的响应[J]. 干旱气象, 2020, 38(1): 1-13.
[15]	马有绚, 李万志, 王丽霞, 白文蓉, 王紫文. 基于SPI的青海省春季干旱时空演变特征及环流诊断[J]. 干旱气象, 2020, 38(03): 362-370.

基于SPEI的黄淮地区夏季干旱时空异常特征及成因

Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Summer Drought Anomaly and Its Causes Based on SPEI in Huang-Huai Area

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics